[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-605) Make Explanation include information about match/non-match

2006-06-19 Thread paul.elschot (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-605?page=comments#action_12416788 ] paul.elschot commented on LUCENE-605: - The purpose of Explanation is to explain all the mysteries of query search, so it would be worthwhile to use an extra class for the

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-605) Make Explanation include information about match/non-match

2006-06-19 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-605?page=comments#action_12416792 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-605: - Hmmm... a subclass relationship might make a lot of sense here ... if we add an isMatch() method to the existing Explanation which infers

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-605) Make Explanation include information about match/non-match

2006-06-18 Thread paul.elschot (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-605?page=comments#action_12416658 ] paul.elschot commented on LUCENE-605: - I like the Boolean for indicating the match. The demo-fix.patch applies cleanly on my working copy, and all tests pass with it.

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-605) Make Explanation include information about match/non-match

2006-06-18 Thread paul.elschot (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-605?page=comments#action_12416660 ] paul.elschot commented on LUCENE-605: - I tried removing the Explanation constructor that is deprecated in the demo-fix.patch. One of the uses of this constructor is in