[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12446122 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-701:
-
Nice job on this very ambitious patch (all 3500 lines of it!) Good tests are
certainly important!
Could you elaborate o
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12446342 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-701:
---
Thanks Yonik for looking at this!
> Could you elaborate on how the backward compatibility works w.r.t. modif
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12446344 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-701:
---
> > on one platform (OS X) I found that the directory listing can be incorrect
> > (stale) by up to 1.0 seco
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12446346 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-701:
---
> In the absense of contention, have you noticed any performance differences in
> opening an IndexReader?
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12446397 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-701:
-
Thanks for all the details Michael! A few more random comments and questions:
In the future, it might be nice if there
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12446628 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-701:
---
Good questions!
> In the future, it might be nice if there was an option to disable
> segments.gen to be mor
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12446638 ]
Ning Li commented on LUCENE-701:
Can the following scenario happen with lock-less commits?
1 A reader reads segments.1, which says the index contains seg_1.
2 A wr
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12446649 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-701:
-
> 3 The reader tries to load seg_1 and fails.
That wouldn't be considered a failure because it's part of the retry logi
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12446656 ]
Ning Li commented on LUCENE-701:
> That wouldn't be considered a failure because it's part of the retry logic.
> At that point, an attempt would be made to open se
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12446665 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-701:
-
> > In the future, it might be nice if there was an option to disable
> > segments.gen to be more friendly to write-once
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12446677 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-701:
---
Right, this is just normal contention. We do indeed retry around not
only loading of segments_N but also th
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12446678 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-701:
---
> > In the future, it might be nice if there was an option to disable
> > segments.gen to be more friendly to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12447574 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-701:
-
Looks good Michael, I think this is ready to commit!
Does anyone have any concerns with this going into the trunk?
> Loc
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12447601 ]
Steven Parkes commented on LUCENE-701:
--
I'm all for the patch ... the only thing I'm wondering is about release timing,
if that's issue? This changes the on-d
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12448892 ]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-701:
-
Steven - I don't see any issues with this going in before 2.1. As a matter of
fact, this may be a sufficiently
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12448902 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-701:
---
Oooh -- I would love to!
> Lock-less commits
> -
>
> Key: LUCENE-701
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
