[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-755?page=comments#action_12460496 ]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-755:
Great patch, Michael, and something that will come in handy for a lot of
people. I can vouch it applies cleanly a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-755?page=comments#action_12460647 ]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-755:
--
> Great patch, Michael, and something that will come in handy for a lot of
> people. I can vouch it applies cleanly an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12463414
]
Nicolas Lalevée commented on LUCENE-755:
The patch I have just upload (payload.patch) is Michael's one (paylo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12479781
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-755:
Nicolas,
Are you implying your patch fits in with 662 (and needs to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12479841
]
Nicolas Lalevée commented on LUCENE-755:
Grant>
The patch I have propsed here has no dependency on LUCENE-662
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481003
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-755:
OK, I've applied the patch. All tests pass for me. I think it look
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481014
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-755:
--
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-755:
---
I think it makes the most sense to get flexible indexing in first,
and then make payloads work with it. On the other hand, payloads
looked pretty straightforward to me, whereas FI is much more involved
(or at least it feels that way).
As it is right now, I would like to at least review the
Hi Grant,
LUCENE-662 contains different ideas:
1) introduction of an index format concept
2) extensibility of the store reader/writer
3) New: extensibility of the posting reader/writer
IMO we should split this up, that way it will be easier to develop
smaller patches that focus on adding one pa
Hi Michael,
This is very good. I know 662 is different, just wasn't sure if
Nicolas patch was meant to be applied after 662, b/c I know we had
discussed this before.
I do agree with you about planning this out, but I also know that
patches seem to motivate people the best and provide a c
10 matches
Mail list logo
