[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1194.
----------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

> Add deleteByQuery to IndexWriter
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1194
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1194
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.4
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1194.patch, LUCENE-1194.take2.patch
>
>
> This has been discussed several times recently:
>   http://markmail.org/message/awlt4lmk3533epbe
>   http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-user/57384#57384
> If we add deleteByQuery to IndexWriter then this is a big step towards
> allowing IndexReader to be readonly.
> I took the approach suggested in that first thread: I buffer delete
> queries just like we now buffer delete terms, holding the max docID
> that the delete should apply to.
> Then, I also decoupled flushing deletes (mapping term or query -->
> actual docIDs that need deleting) from flushing added documents, and
> now I flush deletes only when a merge is started, or on commit() or
> close().  SegmentMerger now exports the docID map it used when
> merging, and I use that to renumber the max docIDs of all pending
> deletes.
> Finally, I turned off tracking of memory usage of pending deletes
> since they now live beyond each flush.  Deletes are now only
> explicitly flushed if you set maxBufferedDeleteTerms to something
> other than DISABLE_AUTO_FLUSH.  Otherwise they are flushed at the
> start of every merge.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to