On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 14:35 -1000, Chuck Williams wrote:
> I'm not sure what form you would like that help to take, but here are a
> couple high-level points imho:
Help in configuring Lucene so that it uses all resources available, and
so that the results returned are identical to all other engin
Sebastiano Vigna wrote on 05/28/2006 10:39 PM:
> but we will certainly need
> some help to configure Lucene so that it works at its best.
>
> We would like to measure indexing time and query answer time
>
I'm not sure what form you would like that help to take, but here are a
couple high-level
On May 29, 2006, at 10:58 AM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Has anyone used existing categorization data associated with the
Reuters corpus to build a benchmarker that measured IR precision
and/or recall?
That would be RCV1 or RCV2, right? AFAIK the Reuters-21578 has no
such information ... Th
Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On May 29, 2006, at 10:34 AM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
It could use the Reuters corpus
Has anyone used existing categorization data associated with the
Reuters corpus to build a benchmarker that measured IR precision
and/or recall?
That would be RCV1 or RCV2, right
On May 29, 2006, at 10:34 AM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
It could use the Reuters corpus
Has anyone used existing categorization data associated with the
Reuters corpus to build a benchmarker that measured IR precision and/
or recall?
Marvin Humphrey
Rectangular Research
http://www.rectang
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
OG: But Andrzej, you already wrote that indexing benchmark tool (which we never
put anywhere in SVN, I'm afraid) that works on some freely available Reuters
corpus, I believe. Why couldn't that be adapted for testing Lucene, Egothor,
and MG4J?
Hmm, yes, indeed I h
Hi,
- Original Message
From: Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dave Kor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5/29/06, Sebastiano Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dear Lucene developers,
>> I'd be interested in doing some benchmarking on (at least) Lucene,
>> Egothor and MG4J. There is no actual dat
Dave Kor wrote:
Hi,
On 5/29/06, Sebastiano Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Lucene developers,
I'd be interested in doing some benchmarking on (at least) Lucene,
Egothor and MG4J. There is no actual data around on publicly available
collections, and it would be nice to have some more objec
On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 17:33 +0800, Dave Kor wrote:
> I was wondering if you have seen the TREC 2004 paper by Giuseppe
> Attardi, Andrea Esuli and Chirag Pate from the University of Pisa,
> Italy, titled "Using Clustering and Blade Clusters in the TeraByte
> task"? http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec13/
al Message
From: Sebastiano Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 29 May, 2006 10:39:43 AM
Subject: Benchmarking on GOV2
Dear Lucene developers,
I'd be interested in doing some benchmarking on (at least) Lucene,
Egothor and MG4J. There is no actual da
Hi,
We have been doing such a benchmark over all TREC collections and TREC
queries. Our participation to TREC in last years gives us the opportunity
to work on the collections. Lucene is one of the systems that we look at.
The measurements are based on two functionalities; indexing and querying.
W
Hi,
On 5/29/06, Sebastiano Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Lucene developers,
I'd be interested in doing some benchmarking on (at least) Lucene,
Egothor and MG4J. There is no actual data around on publicly available
collections, and it would be nice to have some more objective data on
effi
Dear Lucene developers,
I'd be interested in doing some benchmarking on (at least) Lucene,
Egothor and MG4J. There is no actual data around on publicly available
collections, and it would be nice to have some more objective data on
efficiency for a significantly large collection.
We have GOV2 (25M
13 matches
Mail list logo
