Hi again,

This a follow up to my post last year.. I've an article about a demo
mashup program I've included with skwish's latest release:
http://skwish.sourceforge.net/tikluc.html

Not sure if the demo is a good candidate for performance comps, but
perhaps some useful strategies there for "externalizing" stored
fields.

Kind regards,
-Babak
http://skwish.sourceforge.net/

On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Michael McCandless
<luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
> This looks interesting!
> I assume one could use Skwish instead of Lucene's normal stored fields to
> store & retrieve document data?
> Have you run any threaded performance tests comparing the two?
> Mike
>
> Babak Farhang <farh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I've been working on a library called Skwish to complement indexes
>> like Lucene,  for blob storage and retrieval. This is nothing more
>> than a structured implementation of storing all the files in one file
>> and managing their offsets in another.  The idea is to provide a fast,
>> concurrent, lock-free way to serve lots of files to lots of users.
>>
>> Hope you find it useful or interesting.
>>
>> -Babak
>> http://skwish.sourceforge.net/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to