On 6/21/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > I haven't looed at the code so i'm not sure ... but my first thought
would
: > be to try both this.doc() and BooleanScorer2.this.doc(), and see which
one
: > passes all the unit tests. Of course, if both of them pass the unit
: > tests
On 6/21/06, DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/21/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> : Not sure what the solution should be:
>
> I haven't looed at the code so i'm not sure ... but my first thought would
> be to try both this.doc() and BooleanScorer2.this.doc(), and see wh
: > I haven't looed at the code so i'm not sure ... but my first thought would
: > be to try both this.doc() and BooleanScorer2.this.doc(), and see which one
: > passes all the unit tests. Of course, if both of them pass the unit
: > tests, then I'd be *really* worried.
: Start worrying!
: this.
On 6/21/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Not sure what the solution should be:
I haven't looed at the code so i'm not sure ... but my first thought would
be to try both this.doc() and BooleanScorer2.this.doc(), and see which one
passes all the unit tests. Of course, if both of
: Not sure what the solution should be:
I haven't looed at the code so i'm not sure ... but my first thought would
be to try both this.doc() and BooleanScorer2.this.doc(), and see which one
passes all the unit tests. Of course, if both of them pass the unit
tests, then I'd be *really* worried.
Hi,
I have just tried to compile lucene with ecj, Eclipse's compiler, and it
complains of errors with BooleanScorer2. The problematic construction is
present 2x in the class:
if (doc() > lastScoredDoc) {
lastScoredDoc = doc();
coordinator.nrMatchers += super.nrMatchers;