: GData, updateable IndexSearcher
Thanks for the code and performance metric Robert. Have you had any issues
with the deleted segments as Doug has been describing?
- Original Message
From: Robert Engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org; jason rutherglen <[EMAIL
y 1, 2006 11:49:41 AM
Subject: RE: GData, updateable IndexSearcher
Attached.
It uses subclasses and instanceof which is sort of "hackish" - to do it
correctly requires changes to the base classes.
-Original Message-
From: jason rutherglen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday
Re: GData, updateable IndexSearcher
Can you post your code?
- Original Message
From: Robert Engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org; jason rutherglen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 1, 2006 11:33:06 AM
Subject: RE: GData, updateable IndexSearcher
Can you post your code?
- Original Message
From: Robert Engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org; jason rutherglen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 1, 2006 11:33:06 AM
Subject: RE: GData, updateable IndexSearcher
fyi, using my reopen(0 implementation (w
Message-
From: jason rutherglen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 1:24 PM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: GData, updateable IndexSearcher
I wanted to post a quick hack to see if it is along the correct lines. A
few of the questions regard whether to resuse
I wanted to post a quick hack to see if it is along the correct lines. A few
of the questions regard whether to resuse existing MultiReaders or simply strip
out only the SegmentReaders. I do a compare on the segment name and made it
public. Thanks!
public static IndexReader reopen(IndexRead
On 4/28/06, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Another complication is determining whether deletions have changed. We
don't have a per-segment version number. We could either add a version
to the segment (perhaps even in the deletions file)
Deletions (.del) --> ByteCount,BitCount,Bits
By
Vanlerberghe, Luc wrote:
So if you want to implement reopen() of a segment, you should be fine by
just reloading the .del file in memory for that segment (while holding
the commit lock of course).
Correct. However if Filters were cached based on the IndexReader (as is
standard) then these fil
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: donderdag 27 april 2006 20:30
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GData, updateable IndexSearcher
On 4/27/06, Robert Engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought each segment maintained its own list of deleted documents
Right.
> (since s
On 4/27/06, Robert Engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought each segment maintained its own list of deleted documents
Right.
> (since segments are WRITE ONCE
Yes, but deletions are the exception to that rule. Once written,
segment files never change, except for the file that tracks deleted
ay be
"unstable".
-Original Message-
From: Doug Cutting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 3:44 PM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: GData, updateable IndexSearcher
jason rutherglen wrote:
> I was thinking you implied that you knew of someone
dnesday, April 26, 2006 1:44:08 PM
Subject: Re: GData, updateable IndexSearcher
jason rutherglen wrote:
> I was thinking you implied that you knew of someone who had customized their
> own, but it was a closed source solution. And if so then you would know how
> that project faired.
Message
>> From: Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 11:27:44 AM
>> Subject: Re: GData, updateable IndexSearcher
>>
>> jason rutherglen wrote:
>>
>>> Interesting, does this
.
Doug
- Original Message
From: Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 11:27:44 AM
Subject: Re: GData, updateable IndexSearcher
jason rutherglen wrote:
Interesting, does this mean there is a plan for incrementally updateable
I
On 4/26/06, jason rutherglen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As this would be used with Solr I wonder if there would be a good way to also
> update the Solr caches.
Other than re-executing queries that generated the results? Probably not.
The nice thing about knowing exactly when the view of an inde
ginal Message
From: Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 11:27:44 AM
Subject: Re: GData, updateable IndexSearcher
jason rutherglen wrote:
> Interesting, does this mean there is a plan for incrementally updateable
> IndexSearchers
16 matches
Mail list logo
