Re: Helping PyLucene and RubyLucene incubate

2005-05-10 Thread Doug Cutting
Andi Vajda wrote: The Ruby work may be from scratch, I don't know. But the project to incubate, the project we've been talking about for a while now, SWIGLucene-unless-we-come-up-with-a-better-name, would include PyLucene, not from scratch, RubyLucene, and maybe others. Attached is a message I s

Re: Helping PyLucene and RubyLucene incubate

2005-05-10 Thread Erik Hatcher
I'm cross-posting to java-dev just to let folks know we've moved this conversation over to [EMAIL PROTECTED] On May 10, 2005, at 8:14 AM, Brian McCallister wrote: The ruby part of it is from scratch, but I am using Andi's work extensively, and it relies on that work for all practical purposes.

Re: Helping PyLucene and RubyLucene incubate

2005-05-09 Thread Andi Vajda
If the Ruby work is going to be from scratch then no incubation is necessary. We can give Andi and Brian M. commit privileges to a /ruby tree easily already to allow that to start happening. The Ruby work may be from scratch, I don't know. But the project to incubate, the project we've been talk

Re: Helping PyLucene and RubyLucene incubate

2005-05-09 Thread Erik Hatcher
On May 9, 2005, at 10:48 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: This may be more appropriate for general@, but I don't know who's on it. There is a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list :) (CC'd) I was supposed to help Andi Vajda and a few more guys get going with PyLucene and RubyLucene incubation. I'm not finding time f

Helping PyLucene and RubyLucene incubate

2005-05-09 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
This may be more appropriate for general@, but I don't know who's on it. Hello, I was supposed to help Andi Vajda and a few more guys get going with PyLucene and RubyLucene incubation. I'm not finding time for that and feel pretty bad about it. There is no reason to hold things up - Andi and th