, Patch Available] (was: [Patch Available, New])
Committed revision 728746.
Thanks Shai!
> Minor refactoring to IndexFileNameFilter
>
>
> Key: LUCENE-1499
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/bro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1499:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Minor refactoring to IndexFileNameFil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-1499:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1499.patch
> Minor refactoring to IndexFileNameFil
Minor refactoring to IndexFileNameFilter
Key: LUCENE-1499
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1499
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Index
Sure
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
> I think this makes sense. Can you submit patch? Thanks Shai.
>
> Mike
>
>
> Shai Erera wrote:
>
> Hi
>>
>> Is IndexFileNameFilter supposed to be a s
I think this makes sense. Can you submit patch? Thanks Shai.
Mike
Shai Erera wrote:
Hi
Is IndexFileNameFilter supposed to be a singleton (looks like it)?
If so, shouldn't its constructor be private?
Also, since it has a static getFilter() method, its singleton should
also be priva
Hi
Is IndexFileNameFilter supposed to be a singleton (looks like it)?
If so, shouldn't its constructor be private?
Also, since it has a static getFilter() method, its singleton should also be
private.
I checked and there are no references to either the singleton or the
constructor outside
