Well, we have our first Java 1.5 patch... Now that we have had a week
or two to digest the comments, do we want to reopen the discussion?
Chuck Williams (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-600?page=all ]
Chuck Williams updated LUCENE-600:
-
I think the last discussion ended with the main counter-argument being
lack of support by gjc. Current top of GJC News:
> *June 6, 2006* RMS approved the plan to use the Eclipse compiler as
> the new gcj front end. Work is being done on the |gcj-eclipse| branch;
> it can already build libgcj. Thi
In addition to performance, productivity and functionality benefits, my
main argument for 1.5 is that it is used by the vast majority of lucene
community members.
I am not so sure about this. Perhaps we should take a poll on the user
list? Not even sure how that would be managed or counted
he.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 5:01:30 PM
Subject: Re: Java 1.5 was [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-600) ParallelWriter companion
to ParallelReader
> In addition to performance, productivity and functionality benefits, my
> main argument for 1.5 is that it is used by the vast majority of luc
ng for one...
Otis
- Original Message
From: Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 5:01:30 PM
Subject: Re: Java 1.5 was [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-600) ParallelWriter companion
to ParallelReader
In addition to performance,
AM
Subject: Re: Java 1.5 was [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-600) ParallelWriter companion
to ParallelReader
+1
Do you want to post it on the user list? It might also be good to put
it up on the main website.
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Grant: how to poll users? How about this:
> http://www.quim
