On Dec 5, 2005, at 2:03 AM, Ray Tsang wrote:
I think this release issue died out again. I noticed an increase in
commit activities recently! I've also noticed the release plan for
2.0 on the wiki. Does current 1.9 already meet the criterias for 2.0?
At least API-wise? If so, is it possible t
Hi All,
I think this release issue died out again. I noticed an increase in
commit activities recently! I've also noticed the release plan for
2.0 on the wiki. Does current 1.9 already meet the criterias for 2.0?
At least API-wise? If so, is it possible to make ways for a release?
at least mar
How about setting some preliminary due dates, so that things don't
just hang there.
ray,
On 10/15/05, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Re Votes - yes, please use that feature to help prioritize.
>
> Otis
>
> --- Ray Tsang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ah I see it. Should we start
Re Votes - yes, please use that feature to help prioritize.
Otis
--- Ray Tsang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah I see it. Should we start assigning and voting for issues that
> should make it into the 1.9 release? Maybe set a due date for
> submitting these 1.9-bound issues, a week for voting a
Ah I see it. Should we start assigning and voting for issues that
should make it into the 1.9 release? Maybe set a due date for
submitting these 1.9-bound issues, a week for voting and review, and
then allocate time for applying the patches. I can't wait to see an
officially released 1.9!
Also,
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ray Tsang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Oct 15, 2005 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: Lucene 1.9 release date?
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Can we add a 1.9 release to the roadmap? or start a 1.9 release tracker issue?
ray,
On 10/15/05, Erik Hatcher &
