Re: Lucene 2.3 RC 1 available for testing

2008-01-10 Thread DM Smith
Michael Busch wrote: Hi all, I just created the release artifacts (incl. maven artifacts) from the 2.3 branch and uploaded the files to http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene_2_3/rc1/. Let's try to use the next days for testing to ensure that we find serious bugs or build proble

Re: Lucene 2.3 RC 1 available for testing

2008-01-10 Thread Michael Busch
Chris Hostetter wrote: > : I just created the release artifacts (incl. maven artifacts) from the > : 2.3 branch and uploaded the files to > : http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene_2_3/rc1/. > > Some misc comments while purusing the release artifacts... > > 1) the release release s

Re: Lucene 2.3 RC 1 available for testing

2008-01-09 Thread Chris Hostetter
: I just created the release artifacts (incl. maven artifacts) from the : 2.3 branch and uploaded the files to : http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene_2_3/rc1/. Some misc comments while purusing the release artifacts... 1) the release release should use the version number "2.3.0"

Re: Lucene 2.3 RC 1 available for testing

2008-01-09 Thread Michael Busch
Awesome! Thanks everyone who gave feedback already. So far it seems that rc1 is stable and doesn't cause problems after upgrading from 2.2. A lot of the major changes in 2.3 are tested implicitly after upgrading, such as the new DocumentsWriter or background merges. However, there are a bunch of n

Re: Lucene 2.3 RC 1 available for testing

2008-01-09 Thread Peter Keegan
I've built a production index with rc1 and blasted it with lots of concurrent queries and I've seen no problems. I plan to do a lot more development and testing with 2.3 in the next few months. Peter On Jan 7, 2008 10:27 PM, Michael Busch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I just created t

Re: Lucene 2.3 RC 1 available for testing

2008-01-09 Thread Chris Hostetter
: So please help testing the release files on different platforms with : different JVM versions. FWIW: i just did a simple jar(s) swap with Solr 1.2 and Solr trunk, basic searching/highlighting/updating worked fine on the Sole example data (with and without Solr recompile) -Hoss ---

Re: Lucene 2.3 RC 1 available for testing

2008-01-09 Thread testn
testing and the feedback! > > -Michael > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.

Re: Lucene 2.3 RC 1 available for testing

2008-01-08 Thread Michael Busch
Uwe Schindler wrote: > > Thanks, works great with panFMP! Until now, no bugs during > harvesting/indexing. > Great! Thanks for testing and the feedback! -Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comm

RE: Lucene 2.3 RC 1 available for testing

2008-01-08 Thread Uwe Schindler
> Michael Busch wrote: > > Steven A Rowe wrote: > >> I think this sounds reasonable - the Implementation-Version can have > the X.X.X-rcX syntax (or any other the project chooses), but the > Specification-Version should stick to the Java-specified syntax: X ( '.' X > )* > >> > > > > OK I agree. I j

Re: Lucene 2.3 RC 1 available for testing

2008-01-08 Thread Michael Busch
Michael Busch wrote: > Steven A Rowe wrote: >> I think this sounds reasonable - the Implementation-Version can have the >> X.X.X-rcX syntax (or any other the project chooses), but the >> Specification-Version should stick to the Java-specified syntax: X ( '.' X )* >> > > OK I agree. I just opene

Re: Lucene 2.3 RC 1 available for testing

2008-01-08 Thread Michael Busch
Steven A Rowe wrote: > > I think this sounds reasonable - the Implementation-Version can have the > X.X.X-rcX syntax (or any other the project chooses), but the > Specification-Version should stick to the Java-specified syntax: X ( '.' X )* > OK I agree. I just opened LUCENE-1123 and plan to c

RE: Lucene 2.3 RC 1 available for testing

2008-01-08 Thread Steven A Rowe
On 01/08/2008 at 2:36 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > As the specification (*the API*) of Lucene 2.3 is final, there should > stand 2.3. The Implementation version may contain "-dev" or "-rxX", > which is legal. > > This will not be a problem of the release version, but it should be > correctly set (a

RE: Lucene 2.3 RC 1 available for testing

2008-01-08 Thread Uwe Schindler
4 X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.4 - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 1:39 PM > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.o

Re: Lucene 2.3 RC 1 available for testing

2008-01-08 Thread Grant Ingersoll
L PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 4:28 AM To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Lucene 2.3 RC 1 available for testing Hi all, I just created the release artifacts (incl. maven artifacts) from the 2.3 branch and uploaded the files to http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene_2_3/rc1/.

RE: Lucene 2.3 RC 1 available for testing

2008-01-07 Thread Uwe Schindler
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 4:28 AM > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Lucene 2.3 RC 1 available for testing > > Hi all, > > I just created the release artifacts (incl. maven artifacts) from the > 2.3 branch and uploaded the files to > h

Lucene 2.3 RC 1 available for testing

2008-01-07 Thread Michael Busch
Hi all, I just created the release artifacts (incl. maven artifacts) from the 2.3 branch and uploaded the files to http://people.apache.org/~buschmi/staging_area/lucene_2_3/rc1/. Let's try to use the next days for testing to ensure that we find serious bugs or build problems as early as possible.