We could cut a *real* release candidate that we could VOTE on soon,
right? It's bee 3.5 weeks since the first release candidate.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello Lucene users,
We certainly could - only thought I would have is that we do want RC4 to
get a little exposure if possible (though at this point, I don't see
more than a couple days being needed, and we have had one or two).
I'll go when you guys say go.
- Mark
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> We could cut a *real* releas
To be nit picky - I think its been 2.5 weeks.
I feel pretty good about 2.9 myself at this point though.
Mark Miller wrote:
> We certainly could - only thought I would have is that we do want RC4 to
> get a little exposure if possible (though at this point, I don't see
> more than a couple days be
+1 on calling a vote.
On Sep 14, 2009, at 7:45 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
We could cut a *real* release candidate that we could VOTE on soon,
right? It's bee 3.5 weeks since the first release candidate.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Mark Miller
wro
hi guys,
Returning from a long freeze in the middle of releasing I feel rusty about
the process, so a quick question:
Will checking in documentation fixes anyhow interfere with this?
There are 3 such open issues marked for 2.9:
- LECENE-1908 (Similarity scoring jdocs) that is ready and I would lik
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene 2.9 RC4 now available for testing
hi guys,
Returning from a long freeze in the middle of releasing I feel rusty about
the process, so a quick question:
Will checking in documentation fixes anyhow interfere with this?
There are 3 such open issues marked for
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Doron Cohen wrote:
> Will checking in documentation fixes anyhow interfere with this?
The tentative consensus so far is that we are free to make javadocs
only changes w/o rolling a new RC.
Mike
--
On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:53 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Doron Cohen
wrote:
Will checking in documentation fixes anyhow interfere with this?
The tentative consensus so far is that we are free to make javadocs
only changes w/o rolling a new RC.
AIUI, the
The vote will be on the final artifacts - the final artifacts will
just contain the javadoc changes.
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)
On Sep 15, 2009, at 6:57 AM, Grant Ingersoll
wrote:
On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:53 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:22
: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:19 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene 2.9 RC4 now available for testing
>
> The vote will be on the final artifacts - the final artifacts will
> just contain the javadoc cha
Please commit the sim scoring javadoc improvements and I'll make the
voting artifacts (quite possibly today).
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Doron Cohen wrote:
> hi guys,
> Returning from a long freeze in the middle of releasing I feel rusty
> about the process, so a quick question
Committed!
Doron
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Please commit the sim scoring javadoc improvements and I'll make the
> voting artifacts (quite possibly today).
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
