Re: svn:mergeinfo prop

2009-10-23 Thread Earwin Burrfoot
It's okay in a sense. See, svn's merge-tracking support was grafted onto it in a particulary hideous way and is really hairy on the insides. So while there's no sane explanation for that behaviour, it is expected. See -

Re: svn:mergeinfo prop

2009-10-23 Thread Michael McCandless
OK thanks for the pointer :) It's very strange indeed. Mike On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Earwin Burrfoot ear...@gmail.com wrote: It's okay in a sense. See, svn's merge-tracking support was grafted onto it in a particulary hideous way and is really hairy on the insides. So while there's

RE: svn:mergeinfo prop

2009-10-23 Thread Uwe Schindler
Subject: Re: svn:mergeinfo prop OK thanks for the pointer :) It's very strange indeed. Mike On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Earwin Burrfoot ear...@gmail.com wrote: It's okay in a sense. See, svn's merge-tracking support was grafted onto it in a particulary hideous way and is really

Re: svn:mergeinfo prop

2009-10-23 Thread Michael McCandless
...@mikemccandless.com] Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 10:19 PM To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: svn:mergeinfo prop OK thanks for the pointer :)  It's very strange indeed. Mike On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Earwin Burrfoot ear...@gmail.com wrote: It's okay in a sense. See, svn's