Re: FieldCache parser

2005-06-03 Thread Rasik Pandey
Hi Doug, Based upon your changes I have reworked a contribution for efficient sorting of "long" values which I submitted some time back numbered 34563 in Bugzilla. Please let me know if you have any questions, comments, or concerns. Regards, Rus On 6/2/05, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: FieldCache parser

2005-06-02 Thread Doug Cutting
Doug Cutting wrote: Attached is a patch that makes it possible to supply a user-specified parser to FieldCache. For example, one might use this to process a date field as ints even if was not indexed as a decimal integer. As there were no objections, I have committed this patch. Doug --

Re: FieldCache parser

2005-05-10 Thread Rasik Pandey
Nice approach. Should SortComparatorSource include a new method decl for SortComparatorSource.newComparator (IndexReader reader, String fieldname, Object valueParser) ? RBP On 5/10/05, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attached is a patch that makes it possible to supply a user-specified

Re: FieldCache parser

2005-05-10 Thread Yonik Seeley
This does solve one problem I was having. There are still a few issues I still need to solve: - double and long support? - Sorting support for multiple indexed fields mapped onto a single field using fieldname=fieldvalue.For example, when field "x" is specified, I actually need just a slice

Re: FieldCache parser

2005-05-10 Thread tjones
+1 like the idea! Attached is a patch that makes it possible to supply a user-specified parser to FieldCache. For example, one might use this to process a date field as ints even if was not indexed as a decimal integer. Comments? Doug --