rsoll [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 6:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: More Java 1.5 in Tests
More importantly, why is Hudson not catching it?
On Jun 12, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Sigh. I'll fix. I should just leave my wo
ache.org]
>> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 6:49 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: More Java 1.5 in Tests
>>
>> More importantly, why is Hudson not catching it?
>>
>> On Jun 12, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
he.org]
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 6:49 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: More Java 1.5 in Tests
>
> More importantly, why is Hudson not catching it?
>
> On Jun 12, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
> > Sigh. I'll fix. I shoul
More importantly, why is Hudson not catching it?
On Jun 12, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Sigh. I'll fix. I should just leave my world on 1.4 until we get
3.0 out...
Mike
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Grant
Ingersoll wrote:
It seems JDK 1.5+ is the de facto for darn
Sigh. I'll fix. I should just leave my world on 1.4 until we get 3.0 out...
Mike
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> It seems JDK 1.5+ is the de facto for darn near everyone...
>
> ant compile-test with JDK 1.4 yields:
>
> common.compile-test:
> [javac] Compiling 82 so
