Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Jun 29, 2005, at 4:26 PM, markharw00d wrote:
Anyone have any objections to committing this addition to Term.java?
_http://www.mail-archive.com/java-dev@lucene.apache.org/msg00618.html_
This change looks good to me. I would have committed it earlier if
others had
On Jun 29, 2005, at 4:26 PM, markharw00d wrote:
Anyone have any objections to committing this addition to Term.java?
_http://www.mail-archive.com/java-dev@lucene.apache.org/msg00618.html_
This change looks good to me. I would have committed it earlier if
others had ok'd it.
Erik
-
Anyone have any objections to committing this addition to Term.java?
_http://www.mail-archive.com/java-dev@lucene.apache.org/msg00618.html_
It's a simple addition to avoid fieldName.intern() overheads by safely
constructing new Term objects from existing Term objects and re-using
it's pre-inte
