-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Haxby wrote:
> John Haxby wrote:
>
>> [...] compiled with gcj that I believe is compiled with gcj [...]
>
>
> It's only compiled once with gcj, if at all :-)
>
> You can get it from
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/upd
John Haxby wrote:
[...] compiled with gcj that I believe is compiled with gcj [...]
It's only compiled once with gcj, if at all :-)
You can get it from
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/4/SRPMS/lucene-1.4.3-1jpp_3fc.src.rpm
A quick inspection of the .spec file
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
2) Is anyone testing against kaffe or other non-sun compilers?
This is important to Debian as any software that can only
be built from a closed-source JDK is considered
a second class citizen. As you can see, we've been poking
at this issue on Lucene 1.4.3 for quite some
On 9/18/05, Jeff Breidenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Putting on my Debian maintainer hat:
>
> 1) Does it make sense for Linux distributions to ship
> Lucene 1.9, or simply wait for 2.0? (I'm thinking 2.0...)
I think it should include what is available. If pre-2.0, it should be 1.4.3and
On Sep 18, 2005, at 3:41 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
1) Does it make sense for Linux distributions to ship
Lucene 1.9, or simply wait for 2.0? (I'm thinking 2.0...)
1.9 deprecates a lot of API, and 2.0 will be the same version with
all the deprecated stuff removed. So if folks jump straight
Putting on my Debian maintainer hat:
1) Does it make sense for Linux distributions to ship
Lucene 1.9, or simply wait for 2.0? (I'm thinking 2.0...)
2) Is anyone testing against kaffe or other non-sun compilers?
This is important to Debian as any software that can only
be built from a closed-sou
Scott Ganyo wrote:
What is required to make the release?
The (somewhat dated) steps are at:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/ReleaseTodo
Probably the first thing to do is to update these (cvs -> svn) and see
if folks suggest any other improvements.
We should start with a 1.9-rc1 relea
i'm willing to help out
On 9/13/05, Scott Ganyo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is required to make the release?
>
> On Sep 12, 2005, at 3:39 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sep 12, 2005, at 1:55 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> >
> >> Erik Hatcher wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> I'm using the trunk of S
What is required to make the release?
On Sep 12, 2005, at 3:39 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Sep 12, 2005, at 1:55 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I'm using the trunk of Subversion (pretty much what 1.9 will be)
on all my projects and it is quite stable. I defer to the
other
On Sep 12, 2005, at 1:55 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I'm using the trunk of Subversion (pretty much what 1.9 will be)
on all my projects and it is quite stable. I defer to the others
on when we release it as 1.9 officially, though.
I think the 1.9 release should be ma
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I'm using the trunk of Subversion (pretty much what 1.9 will be) on all
my projects and it is quite stable. I defer to the others on when we
release it as 1.9 officially, though.
I think the 1.9 release should be made soon. What is required is a
motivated committer wit
11 matches
Mail list logo
