Re: constant-score rewrite mode for NumericRangeQuery

2009-07-18 Thread Michael McCandless
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > I did some perf tests with the well-known PerfTest.java from the > FieldCacheRangeFilter JIRA issue. > > I compared a 5 mio doc index with precStep=4: > > With constant score rewrite: > avg number of terms: 68.3 > TRIE: best time=6.192687 ms;

RE: constant-score rewrite mode for NumericRangeQuery

2009-07-18 Thread Uwe Schindler
er-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com] > Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 8:56 PM > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: constant-score rewrite mode for Numeri

constant-score rewrite mode for NumericRangeQuery

2009-07-17 Thread Michael McCandless
Should we really default to constant-score rewrite with NumericRangeQuery? Would BooleanQuery rewrite mode give better performance on a large index, since the number of terms should be smallish w/ the default precisionStep (4), I think? Mike --