On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> OK. At least I have seen a speed up during my tests :). I have the logs
> somewhere. Which tests were affected negative, then I can look into the
> before/after logs?
Sorry, not sure - it wasn't the slower tests that tipped me off, but
the "
age-
> From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik
> Seeley
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 3:53 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: latest lucene update
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> > Did you also
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Did you also test, that the speed was going back to normal with the latest
> fix in trunk (without modifying Solr code)?
I didn't - I was already part way through implementing advance() in Solr.
I'm sure the advance() fix in Lucene would have
t; To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: latest lucene update
>
> Thanks guys, I had actually meant this message to go to solr-dev...
> hence the "but I think we should implement the new methods anyway".
> I've implemented them, and the performance has returned to normal.
Thanks guys, I had actually meant this message to go to solr-dev...
hence the "but I think we should implement the new methods anyway".
I've implemented them, and the performance has returned to normal.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Yonik
> Seeley
> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:00 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: latest lucene update
>
> Running solr unit tests seems a fair bit slower now. I think the root
> cause may be this:
> http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/do
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> > As far as I know, Shalin implemented the Collectors in Solr with the
> method
> > allowDocsOutOfOrder() returning false. So the collectors should create
> > DocIdSet with correct order.
>
> I think you meant "so the Scorers will be cre
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> As far as I know, Shalin implemented the Collectors in Solr with the method
> allowDocsOutOfOrder() returning false. So the collectors should create
> DocIdSet with correct order.
I think you meant "so the Scorers will be created so that the
> I'm also surprised that more changes weren't necessary to get the
> latest Lucene to work... one thing in particular is docs out of order
> - Solr currently requires them in-order to correctly create DocSet
> instances, and I'm not sure this is the case any more. I'll look into
> it.
As far as
.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik
> Seeley
> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:00 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: latest lucene update
>
> Ru
Running solr unit tests seems a fair bit slower now. I think the root
cause may be this:
http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/a8bd12c3b87e98a3/speed_of_booleanqueries_on_2_9
That may be fixed, but I think we should implement the new methods anyway.
I'm also surprised that more chang
11 matches
Mail list logo
