I forgot to CC java-dev in my response:
Mike
"Michael McCandless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Andi Vajda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Michael McCandless wrote:
> >
> > >> I tried all morning to isolate the problem but I seem to be unable
> > >> to reproduce it in a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531237
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-766:
Hi Nicolas,
Can you still produce this against the trunk now with t
Hmmm, not sure, but in looking at DocumentsWriter, it seems like
lines around 553 might be at issue:
if (tvx != null) {
tvx.writeLong(tvd.getFilePointer());
if (numVectorFields > 0) {
tvd.writeVInt(numVectorFields);
for(int i=0;iSpecifically, the exception bei
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531239
]
Nicolas Lalevée commented on LUCENE-766:
well, I have attached a patch with a test. Add the test and you'll s
You are right Grant -- good catch!!! I have a unit test showing it
now. Thank you :)
So, this case is tickled if you have a doc (or docs) that have some
fields with term vectors enabled, but then later as part of the same
buffered set of docs you have 1 or more docs that have no fields with
ter
document with no term vector fields after documents with term vector fields
corrupts the index
--
Key: LUCENE-1008
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1008
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1008.
Resolution: Fixed
Andi could you test with this fix? But, if this fixes your prob
There are a couple of JIRA issues related to TVs as well, mostly edge
cases, but Andi might want to take a look at them to see if they
describe his situation.
-Grant
On Sep 29, 2007, at 8:35 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
You are right Grant -- good catch!!! I have a unit test showing it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved LUCENE-1006.
--
Resolution: Fixed
committed.
> QueryParser doesn't accept empty string
>
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Michael McCandless wrote:
The new PyLucene is built with a code generator and all public APIs and
classes are made available to Python. SerialMergeScheduler is available.
Wild! Does this mean PyLucene will track tightly to Lucene releases
going forward?
Yes, even more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531259
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-994:
Sorry for the delay. Here is the debug output. As I said, I am actually writ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531260
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-994:
Sorry for the delay. Here is the debug output. As I said, I am actually writ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531261
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-994:
Sorry for the delay. Here is the debug output. As I said, I am actually writ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531262
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-994:
Sorry for the delay. Here is the debug output. As I said, I am actually writ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-994:
---
Attachment: writerinfo.zip
> Change defaults in IndexWriter to maximize "out of the box" performance
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-994:
---
Comment: was deleted
> Change defaults in IndexWriter to maximize "out of the box" performance
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-994:
---
Comment: was deleted
> Change defaults in IndexWriter to maximize "out of the box" performance
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-994:
---
Comment: was deleted
> Change defaults in IndexWriter to maximize "out of the box" performance
>
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Andi Vajda wrote:
Ok, this could explain why the test is passing. In the test I only do one
batch of indexing, not several like here. I missed that difference. My
apologies. I'm going to change my test now and report back...
I finally isolated the bug into a simple Java
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Andi Vajda wrote:
I finally isolated the bug into a simple Java unit test. It indeed had to do
with doing multiple batches of document additions.
I forgot to say that I ran this with the most recent fixes for bug 1008.
To be precise, lucene svn rev 580605.
Andi..
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531269
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-994:
---
Thanks Mark! OK, I noticed a few things from the logs:
* I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531270
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-994:
Anytime Michael. Thanks for pointing out the mergefactor issue to me. I
rec
LogByteSizeMergePolicy over-merges with autoCommit=false and documents with
term vectors and/or stored fields
-
Key: LUCENE-1009
URL: https://issues.apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-994.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Marking this as fixed again; I opened LUCENE-1009 for the slowdown
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531273
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-994:
---
> Anytime Michael. Thanks for pointing out the mergefactor iss
Document with no term vectors mixed with ones that have term vectors cause
EOFException during merge
Key: LUCENE-1010
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/L
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1010:
---
Description:
Another spinoff from here:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/luc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1010.
Resolution: Fixed
> Document with no term vectors mixed with ones that have term v
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1009.
Resolution: Fixed
> LogByteSizeMergePolicy over-merges with autoCommit=false and d
Two or more writers over NFS can cause index corruption
---
Key: LUCENE-1011
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1011
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Componen
30 matches
Mail list logo