[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531428
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1011:
> i'm not an expert on file Locking (either in Lucene, or i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531433
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-994:
---
> While trying Solr with the latest Lucene, I ran into this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531434
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-994:
---
> It was my impression that this Lucene release would be unus
IndexWriter.setMaxMergeDocs gives non-backwards-compatible exception "out of
the box"
-
Key: LUCENE-1013
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1013
Projec
IndexWriter.optimize() does not respect maxMergeDocs
Key: LUCENE-1014
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1014
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: In
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531440
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1012:
> - It seems that DocumentsWriter does not obey the maxMerg
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531509
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1013:
--
> fix LogByteSizeMergePolicy to allow setting of the max by either MB o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1012?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531510
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1012:
--
> We could just fix the javadocs to match the current approach?
That so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531513
]
Ning Li commented on LUCENE-1007:
-
One more thing about the approximation of actual bytes used for buffered delete
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531517
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1007:
Whoa, good catch! OK I'll divide by 8.
> Flexibility to t
Hello,
As part of my MSc project this summer I developed geoLucene, a
modified version of Lucene (based on 2.3-dev checked out on 05.07)
that can index geographical data using R-trees. It has been shown to
be faster on geographic queries than the unmodified Lucene. The code
is hosted at https://so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531623
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-994:
-
lucene's "commitment" to backward compatibility requires that 2.X be API
compatib
Great work, Evgeny!
I'm certainly interested in this area and will be dissecting this in
some detail.
I've done similar work before but making use of JTS (Java Topology
Suite), using the OpenGIS standards for spatial features/queries and
2-pass spatial queries (first rough pass is MBB only,
Quadtrees and R-trees have been used as special "domain" indexes in Oracle
RDBMS for Spatial:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/spatial/htdocs/data_sheet_9i/9iR2_spatial_ds.html
Some lectures and papers:
http://csiweb.ucd.ie/staff/mbertolotto/home/lecture-notes4025-07-08.htm
http://ieeex
Hi,
This is probably a question for the user list. However, as it relates to the
performance issue, also Lucene index format, I think better to ask the gurus
in this list ;-)
In my application, I have implemented a quality score for each document. For
each search performed, the relevancy score is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-743:
-
Attachment: lucene-743-take2.patch
I'm attaching a new version of the patch that has a lot of cha
Hi,
I noticed the following exception in TestConcurrentMergeScheduler:
[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestConcurrentMergeScheduler
[junit] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 17.765 sec
[junit] - Standard Error -
[junit] Excepti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531700
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-935:
--
Does our build machine have local access to
/www/people.apache.org/mav
18 matches
Mail list logo