[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1647.
Resolution: Fixed
> IndexReader.undeleteAll can mess up the deletion count stored
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12712412#action_12712412
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1654:
bq. Let's have string key-value p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12712413#action_12712413
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1654:
-
We can start with string key-value pair
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12712424#action_12712424
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1654:
OK I'll start with that.
> Inclu
remove 1.5 only unit test code that snuck in
Key: LUCENE-1655
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1655
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Michael McCandless
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1654:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1654.patch
OK I added per-segment private storage of diagnostics
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1655.
Resolution: Fixed
> remove 1.5 only unit test code that snuck in
> ---
One thing I don't fully understand about actsAsVersion (and I know it was
said that we may want to drop that approach) - for how long does it stay? I
mean, let's take the invalidAcronym. It is a change in back-compat, yes. But
for how long are we expected to support it? And if we decide to support
