[ANN] Eclipse GIT plugin beta version released

GIT is one of the most popular distributed version control system. In the hope, that more Java developers may want to explore the world of easy branching, merging and patch management, I'd like to inform you, that a beta version of the upcoming Eclipse GIT plugin is available: http://www.infoq.

Re: Lucene Spatial

Hi Guillermo, As this is the dev list we will continue this discussion via direct mail : i sent one to you right away and i ll try to help you. Nicolas 2010/3/30 Guillermo Payet > Hello, > > I sent this query to the user list, with no luck. I'm hoping someone on > dev might be able to help us

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2310) Reduce Fieldable, AbstractField and Field complexity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851794#action_12851794 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2310: I wonder if, like we're thinking

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1990) Add unsigned packed int impls in oal.util

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851806#action_12851806 ] Toke Eskildsen commented on LUCENE-1990: I am very happy to hear that, Robert. The

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1990) Add unsigned packed int impls in oal.util

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851809#action_12851809 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1990: Toke, are sort ords that much slo

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2310) Reduce Fieldable, AbstractField and Field complexity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851812#action_12851812 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2310: +1 I think this is a great idea. Having a clear

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2310) Reduce Fieldable, AbstractField and Field complexity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851819#action_12851819 ] Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2310: - Yahoo! +1 for introducing barebones int

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2310) Reduce Fieldable, AbstractField and Field complexity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851829#action_12851829 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2310: +1 for this simplification. Can we just name it I

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2310) Reduce Fieldable, AbstractField and Field complexity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851832#action_12851832 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2310: {quote} Can we just name it Indexable, and omit D

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-2353) Config incorrectly handles Windows absolute pathnames

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera reassigned LUCENE-2353: -- Assignee: Shai Erera > Config incorrectly handles Windows absolute pathnames > ---

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2353) Config incorrectly handles Windows absolute pathnames

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851836#action_12851836 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2353: Unless there are objections, I plan to commit thi

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2310) Reduce Fieldable, AbstractField and Field complexity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851839#action_12851839 ] Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2310: - Can't we keep interfaces for indexing a

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2310) Reduce Fieldable, AbstractField and Field complexity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851842#action_12851842 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2310: Right Earwin - agreed. I'd like to summarize a b

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2310) Reduce Fieldable, AbstractField and Field complexity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851844#action_12851844 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2310: Earwin, Yeah definitely we want to keep things s

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2310) Reduce Fieldable, AbstractField and Field complexity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851849#action_12851849 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2310: --- I am also +1 on the indexer interface. I j

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2310) Reduce Fieldable, AbstractField and Field complexity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851850#action_12851850 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2310: Hi Uwe, I envisaged the Indexable providing Tupl

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2353) Config incorrectly handles Windows absolute pathnames

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-2353. Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 929520. > Config incorrectly handles Windows absolute pathna

Re: svn commit: r929520 - in /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/contrib/benchmark: ./ src/java/org/apache/lucene/benchmark/byTask/utils/ src/test/org/apache/lucene/benchmark/byTask/utils/

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:06 AM, wrote: > JIRA-2353: Config incorrectly handles Windows absolute pathnames The JIRA-2353 part is my fault - Shai asked me the right format for JIRA linking, and I got it wrong! Should be LUCENE-2353 of course. need...more...coffee... -Yonik

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2310) Reduce Fieldable, AbstractField and Field complexity

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851856#action_12851856 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2310: --- Yeah! > Reduce Fieldable, AbstractField an

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2184) CartesianPolyFilterBuilder doesn't properly account for which tiers actually exist in the index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll resolved LUCENE-2184. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.1 > CartesianPolyFilterBuilder doesn't properl

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1844) Speed up junit tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1844. Resolution: Fixed This is fixed right? > Speed up junit tests > -

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2350) Refactor/Cleanup Lucene Spatial

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852045#action_12852045 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2350: - Once this is in, let's apply a global c

[SPATIAL] CartesianPolyFilterBuilder ?

Anyone know what the point of this code is from the CartesianPolyFilterBuilder: shape = getShapeLoop(shape, ctp, latX, longX, latY, longY); if (longX2 != 0.0) { if (longX2 != 0.0) { if (longX == 0.0) { longX = longX2; longY = 0.0; shape = getSha

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1990) Add unsigned packed int impls in oal.util

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852074#action_12852074 ] Toke Eskildsen commented on LUCENE-1990: In the original proof of concept for LUCE

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2359) CartesianPolyFilterBuilder doesn't handle edge case around the 180 meridian

CartesianPolyFilterBuilder doesn't handle edge case around the 180 meridian --- Key: LUCENE-2359 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2359 Project: Lucene - Java

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2359) CartesianPolyFilterBuilder doesn't handle edge case around the 180 meridian

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-2359: Attachment: LUCENE-2359.patch Fix. Will commit today or tomorrow. Going to double check

[jira] Reopened: (LUCENE-1709) Parallelize Tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir reopened LUCENE-1709: - I would like to reopen this issue to address some minor things. * junit should not create temp files

Re: [SPATIAL] CartesianPolyFilterBuilder ?

I do. It is clearly related to prime meridian handling but it is unreadable and buggy. I did a complete rewrite of this sector of code commited to Chris Male repository (working together to rework the whole thing). Commit of this work should be done by Chris very soon. Hope it will help. Nicol

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2359) CartesianPolyFilterBuilder doesn't handle edge case around the 180 meridian

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852136#action_12852136 ] Nicolas Helleringer commented on LUCENE-2359: - This is fixed in the pendig re

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2359) CartesianPolyFilterBuilder doesn't handle edge case around the 180 meridian

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852139#action_12852139 ] Nicolas Helleringer commented on LUCENE-2359: - If you want to check / compare

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2359) CartesianPolyFilterBuilder doesn't handle edge case around the 180 meridian

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852141#action_12852141 ] Chris Male commented on LUCENE-2359: Hi Nicolas, Sorry I hadn't seen that you had bee

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2360) speedup recycling of per-doc RAM

speedup recycling of per-doc RAM Key: LUCENE-2360 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2360 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: Index Affects Versions: 3.1

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2111) Wrapup flexible indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2111: --- Attachment: Make2BTermsIndex.java Flex has some trouble making > 2B terms -- attache

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2360) speedup recycling of per-doc RAM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2360: --- Attachment: LUCENE-2360.patch Simple patch, avoids the .toArray. I'll commit shortl

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2329) Use parallel arrays instead of PostingList objects

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch updated LUCENE-2329: -- Attachment: lucene-2329-2.patch This patch: * Changes DocumentsWriter to trigger the flush us

Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #1144

See Changes: [mikemccand] LUCENE-2360: don't use .toArray to recycle byte[] blocks used by doc stores [gsingers] add a minor comment [gsingers] added some comments [gsingers] added some comments, removed an extra, useless i

Parallel tests in Benchmark

Hi I'd like to summarize a discussion I had w/ Robert and Mike last night on IRC, about the parallelism of tasks in Benchmark: For some reason, ever since parallel tasks were introduced, when I run 'ant test' from the contrib/benchmark folder (or the root), the tests just hang at some point, afte

Re: Parallel tests in Benchmark

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Shai Erera wrote: > Hi > > I'd like to summarize a discussion I had w/ Robert and Mike last night on > IRC, about the parallelism of tasks in Benchmark: > > For some reason, ever since parallel tasks were introduced, when I run 'ant > test' from the contrib/benchm

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #1144

Looks like the DB tests failed due to a connection problem. I was wondering yesterday why aren't the required libs checked in to SVN? We can periodically update them, if necessary (e.g. if they fix a bug). We checked in a lot of things already, including the backwards code, so what are 2 more jar

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #1144

: I was wondering yesterday why aren't the required libs checked in to SVN? We Licensing issues. we can't redistribute them (but we can provide the build.xml code to fetch them) -Hoss - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsu