| VNC (Virtual Network Computer) is a step in this direction - it allows
| *any* Unix or Win95/NT system running the VNC viewer client *or* a
| java-capable web browser to access a Unix or Win95/NT box
[ Stephan Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
Veerrry interesting -- thanks for the pointer! I wasn
> Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
> Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 08:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mailed-from: GNU Emacs (19.34.1), of course
On 29-May-98 Steve Byrne wrote:
> >
> > I just (more or less) confirmed that there seems to be a conflict
> > problem between the stock jdk1.1.6v1-test and ld.so-1.9.9.
I've also got this same problem with the stock jdk1.1.5-v7 and ld.so-1.9.9.
This is on a libc box. I was previou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> I just (more or less) confirmed that there seems to be a conflict
> problem between the stock jdk1.1.6v1-test and ld.so-1.9.9.
>
> I've had this problem on both Linux machines I can experiment on:
>
>
> 0. with ld.so-1.9.8 in
On Thu, 28 May 1998, Cynbe ru Taren wrote:
> It's true that one can already run an X server on a PC and access a
> remote Linux GUI. But the typical PC doesn't have an X server
> installed and never will, so this inhibits grabbing a random Windows
> box to do some remote Linux work (and likewise
Rani Pinchuk writes:
> What about TYA? (It is still alive right?) - you can find its URL in
> Java Tools for Linux page of blackdown:
> http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/javatools.html
And it works great for me!
--
Working on SCO is like traveling back in time.
(sorry, this is the last one of me today...)
Well the link of the jmake in perl was lost. Here is the correct one:
http://www.vmunix.com/~gabor/perl/jmake
You just donwload it, put it in /usr/local/bin, chmod +x and then
go to the directory of you java sources and type 'jmake'. It will create
"
What about TYA? (It is still alive right?) - you can find its URL in
Java Tools for Linux page of blackdown:
http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/javatools.html
Rani
On Fri, May 29, 1998 at 12:02:58PM -0400, Villanueva, Edgar wrote:
> have you tried kaffe its pretty fast.
> > --
> > Fro
Hi all,
In the past (in the old version of this mailing list) there were several
threads about make. I kept some of those letters, so here what I got from
there:
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote then:
I haven't heard of jmake. But what about using make itself? Try
something like this:
Bernd Kreimeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems that javac recurses through all dependencies
> for a given app.java, and creates *.class as needed.
> However, it does not seem to check whether the *.java
> file is more recent?
Yep, javac (with or without -depend) isn't perfect.
>
> If t
Yeeehaa! I tried the JDK 1.1.5v7 on Debian 1.1 and javac actually
executed out of the box, with no configuration! Maybe that sounds like no
big deal, but I count that as an enormous victory after fumbling around
with 1.1.5v5 for quite a while. I'll report back after more testing if
there's any w
It seems that javac recurses through all dependencies
for a given app.java, and creates *.class as needed.
However, it does not seem to check whether the *.java
file is more recent?
If that's the case (might be worth submitting a
JDC Bug Parade Entry), is there any way to tweak
GNU make to handl
have you tried kaffe its pretty fast.
> --
> From: gaolei[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 1998 12:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Fwd: re. Jit for linux]
>
> <><>
>
>
Steve Byrne wrote:
> JDK 1.1.5 and 1.1.6 libc are built on a Debian 1.3.1 system -- no problems. My
> libc is 5.4.33, and libdl.so is libdl.so.1 => libdl.so.1.8.12.
? Then why won't it work on mine?
[research, research, test, grind, scratch head...]
AHA! A clue!
I started running java with a
Hi, Spankar,
You really take me a bad news, you know, actually what
I want to find is a good JIT for my servlet run on linux.
:-(
I am hardly able to image the thing is so bad. Even
though I myself have never(don't laugh me) met any
problems with Symantec JIT on windows, I'd rather
believ
On 28 May 1998, John Mitchell wrote:
>
> SSL communication channel built using both server & client certificates,
> administrator login/password if connecting remotely. Yes, I was thinking
> that these admin. servlets would be running in a separate instance of the
> web server (ala your Avenida)
> Dose anybody could give me some advise on good jit
> for java on linux? Or dose jdk1.1.6 have a default
> jit?
Even if you do find a JIT, beware of it. So far (possibly with the
exception of the SunSoft JIT), none of the JIT's I've seen are
reliable especially when you are running significan
Hi, everybody,
Dose anybody could give me some advise on good jit
for java on linux? Or dose jdk1.1.6 have a default
jit?
Thanks.
begin: vcard
fn: Gao Lei
n: Lei;Gao
org:StarGlobe
adr:International Business Park;;#09-02, The Synergy;Si
I just (more or less) confirmed that there seems to be a conflict
problem between the stock jdk1.1.6v1-test and ld.so-1.9.9.
I've had this problem on both Linux machines I can experiment on:
0. with ld.so-1.9.8 installed:
1. Installed jdk1.1.6v1-test.
hello,
as the title says is there anywhere a sparclinux JDK compiled to run under
ultrapinguin distrib? (means using glibc)
ciao
bboett
==
acount at earthling net
http://erm6.u-strasbg.fr/~bboett
===
On Thu, 28 May 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> I think it would be an amazingly cool and good thing to have a GTK based AWT.
You should talk to Doug South <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. From previous talks
with him, it appears as though he's made pretty good headway on a GTK AWT.
- cls
On Thu, 28 May 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> Jauvane Cavalcante de Oliveira writes:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > > Whoops - you need the libc5 version, for sure. Debian 2.0 (hamm) is the first
>with
> > > real glibc support.
> >
> > That's not right. I use Debian 1.3.1 and the glib 1.1.5v5 works j
Jauvane Cavalcante de Oliveira writes:
> Hi there,
>
> > Whoops - you need the libc5 version, for sure. Debian 2.0 (hamm) is the first with
> > real glibc support.
>
> That's not right. I use Debian 1.3.1 and the glib 1.1.5v5 works just fine. I'm going
>to
> try 1.1.5v7 as well as 1.1.6
23 matches
Mail list logo
