Re: AWT-Bug in JDK1.1.6v2

1998-08-04 Thread Eu Hin Chua
On Tue, 4 Aug 1998, Kurt Huwig wrote: > The bug with Swing-Applications and Menu is still there; Menues overwrite the > Menutitle until I move the whole window. This does not happen with 1.1.3, but > happens with both kwm and twm. Hi, Just to confirm this, I can duplicate this bug when using kw

JDK 1.2

1998-08-04 Thread Marcus Brito
Do you have any plans about porting JDK 1.2 to Linux (i386)? Or are you waiting for the final version? A preliminar work on the beta releases would be fine, I think - then when the final version is out, OUR final version won't delay a lot. -- Ja ne, Marcus Pazu Brito Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECT

Servlets on linux

1998-08-04 Thread Alejandro Canales
Hi! I am developing servlets on linux. They work perfectly if I don't use JDBC. With JDBC I lost the output when any function of JDBC is called. I use PrintStream, PrintWriter for handle the output. Any Hint??? Someone has experimented something like thi

Re: new VolanoMark benchmark scalability results

1998-08-04 Thread Matthew Hunter
On Tue, 4 Aug 1998, Leo Cyr wrote: > > Interesting article comparing Java VMs at > > http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-08-1998/jw-08-volanomark.html > > The results here are oriented towards testing lots and lots of > > connections. Suprisingly, Linux does quite poorly with both the JDK > >

jdk 1.1.6v2 and glibc-2.0.95 :(

1998-08-04 Thread Nikolay Grigoriev
Hello! JDK 1.1.6 (glibc version) does not work with glibc-2.0.95 (it's glibc 2.1 AFAIK?) :((( It's because of incompatibilites between supplied with JDK libc.so.6 and my own libc.so.6. I tried to solve them by manipulating some of my libraries, but is was useless :( -- Nickolay G.

Re: AWT-Bug in JDK1.1.6v2

1998-08-04 Thread Kurt Huwig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Thanx for your response. I tried it with twm and both frames appear, so it seems to be due to kwm (KDE Window Manager). But still I get messages like this: Tried to free bogus memory 81c9ea8, ignored Tried to free bogus memory 81c9f80, ignored free: double-fre

Hanging appletviewer on 486

1998-08-04 Thread Tim Freeman
I have two Linux computers. On one, a 486 Tandy 3950 laptop, "appletviewer" with no arguments hangs before giving me the copyright notice box. On the other, a Gateway 2000 60 mhz Pentium, appletviewer seems to work fine. I have tried to minimize the differences between the systems. Any ideas?

Building java

1998-08-04 Thread Sebastian Elbaum
I am building java from source code. I got to build it all(following th FAQ guide) and I can compile and run some programs. What I have troubles with is when I try to use the awt package. This is what I get at run-time: /root/jdk/javasrc/build/lib/i586/green_threads/libawt.so: undefined symbol:

Re: Java and Redhat

1998-08-04 Thread Steve Hier
1. Obtain RH 5.1 2. Start install program 3. Select 'upgrade'. I'm running a system that was upgraded from RH 4.2 and am having no problems with JDK 1.1.6 (+swing). At 05:29 AM 8/4/98 -0700, Eugene Teh wrote: > >Hi, > > It's said that you need > > 1.glibc-2.0.7-7 >

Re: new VolanoMark benchmark scalability results

1998-08-04 Thread Leo Cyr
The most unpleasent part was the Linux VM being unable to achieve more than 2xx or so simultaneous connections Leo Cyr

JDK-TextField-Problem

1998-08-04 Thread Kalimero
I'd placed a TextField or a TextAres (also Swing-Components) into a Window (or JWindow), all inputs appears in the terminal an not in the TextFields. TextFields with Frames or Dialogs work without any problems... Any solutions??? Thx. Wolfgang

Re: [CANCELED] jdk1.1.6 & libc.5.4.46 & XFree86 3.3.1 not working in X

1998-08-04 Thread peter . pilgrim
> > To [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I downloaded the jdk1.1.6v2 for libc5 > but I cannot get AWT stuff to work. > > I understood you one had to compile XFree86 3.3.1 with thread support > So I did this last week. Still does not work for me when I tried > the demo/GraphicsTest/example1.html with the ap

Re: new VolanoMark benchmark scalability results

1998-08-04 Thread Leo Cyr
> Interesting article comparing Java VMs at > http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-08-1998/jw-08-volanomark.html > The results here are oriented towards testing lots and lots of > connections. Suprisingly, Linux does quite poorly with both the JDK > and TowerJ. The article suggests that this mi

JDK1.1.6 for Alpha-Linux?

1998-08-04 Thread Rich Edwards
Does anyone know of any efforts to port the JDK1.1.6 to Alpha-Linux? Thanks, Rich Edwards Senior Software Engineer Codonics, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: AWT-Bug in JDK1.1.6v2

1998-08-04 Thread Juergen Kreileder
Kurt Huwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [1 ] > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hello! > > Linux: SuSE Linux 5.2 > Kernel: 2.0.35 > LibC: libc.so.5.4.44 > JDK: 1.1.6v2 (from java-linux.org) > Processor: AMD K6-233 > With and without Motif 2.0 > WindowManager: KDE 1.0 > X-Server: XFree86

new VolanoMark benchmark scalability results

1998-08-04 Thread Nelson Minar
Interesting article comparing Java VMs at http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-08-1998/jw-08-volanomark.html The results here are oriented towards testing lots and lots of connections. Suprisingly, Linux does quite poorly with both the JDK and TowerJ. The article suggests that this might not ju

jdk1.1.6 & libc.5.4.46 & XFree86 3.3.1 not working in X

1998-08-04 Thread peter . pilgrim
To [EMAIL PROTECTED] I downloaded the jdk1.1.6v2 for libc5 but I cannot get AWT stuff to work. I understood you one had to compile XFree86 3.3.1 with thread support So I did this last week. Still does not work for me when I tried the demo/GraphicsTest/example1.html with the appletviewer. Any i

Re: AWT-Bug in JDK1.1.6v2

1998-08-04 Thread Martin Wickman
On Tue, 4 Aug 1998, Kurt Huwig wrote: > Linux: SuSE Linux 5.2 > Kernel: 2.0.35 > LibC: libc.so.5.4.44 > JDK: 1.1.6v2 (from java-linux.org) > Processor: AMD K6-233 > With and without Motif 2.0 > WindowManager: KDE 1.0 > X-Server: XFree86 Version 3.3.2 > RAM: 64MB > Swap: 128MB > > The following

Announcing JDK 1.1.6 V3 for MkLinux, Linux PMac, Linux PowerPC

1998-08-04 Thread Kevin B. Hendricks
Hi, Your Linux PowerPC JDK Porting Team is pleased to announce JDK 1.1.6 Version 3 for Linux on PowerPC. This release is available from our website and should soon be available on our mirrors: http://business.tyler.wm.edu/mklinux/index.html or for slower connections that don't like java on we

Re: Mail I sent to Inprise

1998-08-04 Thread Richard Jones
Keith T. Garner wrote: > > I sent this off to inprise this morningI'll let you know what response > I get. (Oh man, I just noticed a type/think-o in theres/thing/this/ > towards the bottom.) > > I figured the mentioning of recent events couldn't hurt. If people want to show some suppor

Java and Redhat

1998-08-04 Thread Eugene Teh
Hi, It's said that you need 1.glibc-2.0.7-7 2.glibc-devel-2.0.7-7 to install jdk1.1.6. but Redhat5.0 does not allow the installation of (2) How does one upgrade the Redhat OS from 5.0 to 5.1? This is really frustrating as I searched the whole web

Re: Bitwise Operators.

1998-08-04 Thread Carlos Cassino
Sorry for sending two messages, I had a problem in my connection and thought the first mail was lost (it wasn't even in the system log) so I wrote another... -- Cassino

Re: Bitwise Operators.

1998-08-04 Thread Azazel
Thanks chaps: the operators are now doing what I hoped. Learnt a valuable lesson today: if one is going to twiddle bits it helps if one is familiar with the bits one is twiddling. :) J. +0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ www:http://www.elephant.org/~azazel/ mail: [EMAIL PRO

AWT-Bug in JDK1.1.6v2

1998-08-04 Thread Kurt Huwig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello! Linux: SuSE Linux 5.2 Kernel: 2.0.35 LibC: libc.so.5.4.44 JDK: 1.1.6v2 (from java-linux.org) Processor: AMD K6-233 With and without Motif 2.0 WindowManager: KDE 1.0 X-Server: XFree86 Version 3.3.2 RAM: 64MB Swap: 128MB The following (also attached for c

Re: Bitwise operators

1998-08-04 Thread Dirk Vanhalle
Actually, they all make sense. It's plain 2's complement binary arithmatic. First of all, 0xF0F0F0F0 is a negative (signed) integer number. So assigning it to a long makes it 0xF0F0F0F0L. This accounts for the fact that all 1's are shifted in when you shift right, even if you use '>>>'.