Re: JavaLinux for servlets [off-topic]

1999-02-18 Thread vextor
>The comments regarding applets have nothing to do with C or JNI. Again I'm >trying to say that applets do not make sense in the context of HTML. It's >not Java's fault, it's just how things are. I don't see how this is true. HTTP is supposed to be a stateless, object- oriented protocol which

RE: JavaLinux for servlets, who to make templates?

1999-02-18 Thread Yuri Saveliev
Try Galileo Application Server, it works very well and it's free: http://www.esemplare.com/index.html It has all main features presented in Cold Fusion and uses JDBC instead of ODBC in Windoze version of Cold Fusion. Regards, Yuri Saveliev [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From

Re: More evil from Microsoft [Off topic]

1999-02-18 Thread Ted Garrett
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Dimitris Vyzovitis wrote: > "Harold G. Andrews II" wrote: > > > I noticed another article about a new programming language > > Microsoft is contemplating to get itself out from the litigation it's > > currently in with Sun. Thought you might enjoy reading the story > > your

Re: More evil from Microsoft [Off topic]

1999-02-18 Thread wyrd
"Brett W. McCoy" wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Christopher Rowan wrote: > > > Oops, I thought he was referring to something else. > > > > Didn't Microsoft have a Unix-like OS with a name similar to Minix? > > Xenix, now known as SCO Unix. Not really, different source base. In fact, one of t

Re: More evil from Microsoft [Off topic]

1999-02-18 Thread Robert McConnell
The first impression I have is that it is a dumbed down version of C++ made to look like Java, but not be Java so as to avoid any further entanglements with Sun. I am waiting to see if Micro$oft is really arrogant enough to drop their J++ and replace it with this new toy. Bob McConnell N2SPP At

Re: Making an Java Application "wait" to be called

1999-02-18 Thread B. Scott Boding
Richard Hall wrote: > > I haven't quite figured out what keeps an app from exiting. It seems that > if you don't put a return; at the end of the main() method, it will sit > idly. Maybe someone else can give a definitive answer. > Actually, I think that a Java app will only exit if all of the

Re: Making an Java Application "wait" to be called

1999-02-18 Thread Richard Hall
I'm just going to give you a partial answer, since it's all I am capable of. I think that you probably want to make your application event driven so that requests come in the form of passed events, then the app just sits there waiting for events. Alternately, if it is a server, I think that you

Re: TFS Delivery Failure: Re: Mailing list trouble (fwd)

1999-02-18 Thread John Goerzen
I'm about to ban the IP of that server from my sendmail. It's obviously not compliant with RFCs, and their admins never answer mail. Maybe if they get a 550 when trying to deliver a bounce, it will create a mail loop on their end, hehe :-) On Thu, Feb 18, 1999 at 01:17:55PM -0500, David Harvill

Re: TFS Delivery Failure: Re: Mailing list trouble (fwd)

1999-02-18 Thread David Harvill
Get it every single time -dave

Re: Making an Java Application "wait" to be called

1999-02-18 Thread Trevor Harmon
If you need to make the same connection pool accessible from multiple instances of the Java Virtual Machine, then yes, RMI is about the only solution. If, however, your connection pool can be unique for each launch of a VM, then you could solve your problem quite easily with the good old fashione

Re: Making an Java Application "wait" to be called

1999-02-18 Thread Ernst de Haan
Check out the RMI docs. Especially the part about the Naming service. Should answer your question. If ya have JDK docs installed, check the RMI guide. Christopher Rowan wrote: > > Heya Hiya Ho! > > I want to make a database connection pool class that starts up, > preconnects n jdbc connections

Re: JavaLinux for servlets (die die die)

1999-02-18 Thread Augusto Sellhorn
John; Why are you arguing with Steve ? Isn't he one of the people porting 1.2 to linux ? Let it go, the last thing we need is to have the porters wasting time in this insipid thread. You made your points, let's just leave it at that !!! If you need to discuss your views even more, go to comp.l

java2?

1999-02-18 Thread Ben Jorgensen
Hi! Anybody working on porting java2 to linux? Plans or whatever? Greetings, Ben -- http://surf.to/anTiX

Re: Mailing list trouble

1999-02-18 Thread Nelson Minar
This mailing list has troubles, yes. The maintainer (Karl Asha) asked here about a month ago if someone else could host it, because he didn't have the time or resources to keep it going. Now might be a good opportunity for someone to contact him about rehosting the list. His email address is [EMAI

TFS Delivery Failure: Re: Mailing list trouble (fwd)

1999-02-18 Thread Brett W. McCoy
This is the bounce message I am continually getting. Is anyone else getting this? Brett W. McCoy http://www.lan2wan.com/~bmccoy --- This is an unauthorized cybernetic announc

Re: Mailing list trouble

1999-02-18 Thread John Goerzen
On Thu, Feb 18, 1999 at 12:20:38PM -0500, Brett W. McCoy wrote: > On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, John Goerzen wrote: > > Every message I've posted to the list this week has resulted in a > bounced message from a system where the username is no longer valid. Same here, and I've already complained to thei

RE: Solaris x86 and Linux

1999-02-18 Thread Rob Clevenger
The Solaris X86 for free is a non-commercial license only. You can use linux for a business. also, you don't get Sun's C compiler with that (that's a seperate and expensive package) You can get gcc however for it. Take Care, Rob > -Original Message- > From: Armin kurz [mailto:[EMAIL P

Re: Mailing list trouble

1999-02-18 Thread Brett W. McCoy
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, John Goerzen wrote: > You may want to be on the alert for a message like this. Apparently either > the administrator of java.blackdown.org or a very poorly-written bounce > catcher is seriously misconfigured. If you note, it claims to have removed > me due to bounces my mai

Mailing list trouble

1999-02-18 Thread John Goerzen
You may want to be on the alert for a message like this. Apparently either the administrator of java.blackdown.org or a very poorly-written bounce catcher is seriously misconfigured. If you note, it claims to have removed me due to bounces my mail account caused, but in reality, it was [EMAIL PR

Re: More evil from Microsoft [Off topic]

1999-02-18 Thread Brett W. McCoy
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Christopher Rowan wrote: > Oops, I thought he was referring to something else. > > Didn't Microsoft have a Unix-like OS with a name similar to Minix? Xenix, now known as SCO Unix. Brett W. McCoy http://www.lan2wan.com/~bmc

Re: More evil from Microsoft [Off topic]

1999-02-18 Thread Brian Jones
Christopher Rowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oops, I thought he was referring to something else. > > Didn't Microsoft have a Unix-like OS with a name similar to Minix? Xenix. Radio Shack was using this for their POS systems as recently as around 4 years ago. Brian -- |

Re: More evil from Microsoft [Off topic]

1999-02-18 Thread Christopher Rowan
Oops, I thought he was referring to something else. Didn't Microsoft have a Unix-like OS with a name similar to Minix? Sachin Goyal wrote: > > hello, > > > What was wrong with minix? Seemed like a better direction than DOS or > > > > This their chance to commit suicide... Even windoze people

Re: More evil from Microsoft [Off topic]

1999-02-18 Thread Sachin Goyal
hello, > What was wrong with minix? Seemed like a better direction than DOS or > > This their chance to commit suicide... Even windoze people won't use it, and > > it will pass in swee oblivion like minix... Minix is an early comer in free software world. Most important it was not written for

Re: More evil from Microsoft [Off topic]

1999-02-18 Thread Christopher Rowan
What was wrong with minix? Seemed like a better direction than DOS or Windows... Dimitris Vyzovitis wrote: > > "Harold G. Andrews II" wrote: > > > When I looked at javalobby for the information regarding the JDK 1.2 Source > > Release, I noticed another article about a new programming language

Re: Solaris x86 and Linux

1999-02-18 Thread Christopher Rowan
Considering Sun was born to create "Open Computing" I hope they aren't condemning Linux! That would be TOO hypocritical! I seem to remember an article somewhere saying that from 1.2 they would be "wholeheartedly" supporting Linux... I am new on this list and don't know about the 1.2 Java for Li

Making an Java Application "wait" to be called

1999-02-18 Thread Christopher Rowan
Heya Hiya Ho! I want to make a database connection pool class that starts up, preconnects n jdbc connections, then waits to be called by various apps. How do I make Java wait without exiting and without putting it into a cycle sucking loop? I've checked the API docs and a few books (my due dill

Re: More evil from Microsoft [Off topic]

1999-02-18 Thread Dimitris Vyzovitis
"Harold G. Andrews II" wrote: > When I looked at javalobby for the information regarding the JDK 1.2 Source > Release, I noticed another article about a new programming language > Microsoft is contemplating to get itself out from the litigation it's > currently in with Sun. Thought you might enj

Solaris x86 and Linux

1999-02-18 Thread Armin kurz
Sun ships Solaris x86 without fee except the shipping costs. Does anybody know what Sun's market positioning vision of that product is ? Where do they see Linux then ? Have they declared war to Linux ? And may this be the reason why the java support of Linux isn't what some people expect it t

Re: JavaLinux for servlets [off-topic]

1999-02-18 Thread wyrd
Chris Huebsch wrote: > AFAIK unix doesn't support real threads. Are you sure you want to make such a generalization about Unix? I've got a couple of books that cover threads programming on Solaris. Is there something "unreal" about Solaris ( or UnixWare ) threads? -- wYRd.:|:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: java-plugin for linux/netscape 4.5

1999-02-18 Thread SHUDO Kazuyuki
Michael Sinz worte: > Netscape 4.5 > has Java 1.1 built in and they have a JIT that is a bit better than TYA > in their JVM. (Even the Linux Netscape does on x86 - just like on > Windows x86 systems.) Which archive of Navigator 4.5 has a JIT? I couldn't find a Navigator 4.5 with JIT. The follo