Hi,
I had a problem to get the correct bzip2-archive for the pre_release_v1. I
found out that the netscape communicator causes the error on a http
download. I tried it with a ftp download and it worked!
It could be a good idea, to place the md5-sums of the archives in the
download directories, s
The JIT is one developed by Sun, but it's a lot slower than
the one Sun obtained from Symantec that is included in the windows
version of java. Which in turn is said to be slower than hotspot
for long-running programs.
There was a good set of benchmarks on www.javalobby.org a month
or so ago.
hi,
I use blackdown jdk1.2 on my suse 6.1 and have no problems.So look on the
SUSE CD to get the missing library.
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ramiro Diaz Trepat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Sonntag, 6. Juni 1999 02:58
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: JDK 1.2 pre 2 & S
> Elena Vorisi & Edoardo Comar writes:
Elena> Hi.
Elena> excuse me, it surely is a newbie question ...
Elena> assuming my system is using glibc2.1, which resides in /lib
Elena> why can't I install a glibc2.0 in a /glibc2.0 directory under my home dir
Elena> and have only selected apps (as f
Javier Bolaqos Molina wrote:
>
> "Peter B. West" wrote:
>
> > There was a thread late last month about the corruption of bz2 archives
> > of 1.2. I have just tried to unpack the bz2 archive of 117v3 which I
> > downloaded on May 28. I get the same result; bunzip2 reports corruption
> > of the
Nathan Meyers wrote:
> I've been doing some work with java.awt.Images in the past few days
> (1.2pre2 for glibc2.0, native threads, RH5.2), and I seem to be hitting
> some strange deadlocks between my event and image-loading threads. As
> best I can tell, it looks like ImageObserver.imageUpdate()
I made a delta with xdelta (sould be at ftp://xcf.berkeley.edu) from the
jdk1.2pre-v1 to the pre-v2 for libc 2.1 so I uploaded it to
http://www.multimania.com/gqueri/java/jdk1.2-pre-v1-to-pre-v2.xd.bz2
It is only 3,3 MB so it would be better to get that than the whole dist
Regards, gael
> I have been fighting for days with printing in JDK1.1.7v3 and JDK1.2.2
> without even getting the print job dialog tho show up!
>
> I get the following stack trace using JDK1.2.2:
> Uncaught exception: java.lang.NullPointerException
> at sun.awt.motif.UPrintDialog.(UPrintDialog.java:17
Ok, it starts up fine, but I get no fonts in swing applications. I
guess they aren't too tall :).
Any idea what could be causing this?
glibc2.0.7
redhat 5.2
I'm using the glibc2.0 jdk1.2 build
--
Grace and peace to you from God our Father
and the L
Hi.
excuse me, it surely is a newbie question ...
assuming my system is using glibc2.1, which resides in /lib
why can't I install a glibc2.0 in a /glibc2.0 directory under my home dir
and have only selected apps (as for instance jdk12_pre_v1) use it,
executing them from a shell where I have set
I have been fighting for days with printing in JDK1.1.7v3 and JDK1.2.2
without even getting the print job dialog tho show up!
I get the following stack trace using JDK1.2.2:
Uncaught exception: java.lang.NullPointerException
at sun.awt.motif.UPrintDialog.(UPrintDialog.java:174)
at
I have been fighting for days with printing in JDK1.1.7v3 and JDK1.2.2
without even getting the print job dialog tho show up!
I get the following stack trace using JDK1.2.2:
Uncaught exception: java.lang.NullPointerException
at sun.awt.motif.UPrintDialog.(UPrintDialog.java:174)
at
Hi there.
> under redhat 5.2 (glibc2.0)
>
> with jdk 1.1.7v3 hotjava run well
>
> but with jdk1.2pre2 it fail :
Quoting from the HotJava 3.0 README file:
-8<-
This release of HotJava Browser has been qualified on the JavaOS 1.1
operating environment, running on SPARC(tm)-based JavaSta
under redhat 5.2 (glibc2.0)
with jdk 1.1.7v3 hotjava run well
but with jdk1.2pre2 it fail :
java -cp /usr/local/java/HotJava/Browser.jar sunw.hotjava.Main
-Dhotjava.home=/usr/local/java/HotJava
Running the browser without SSL Manager
[[[ Failed to load scripting engine ]]]Exception in thread "m
Lutz Mueller wrote:
>
> Many thanks for bringing the JDK 1.2 to Linux, but ...
>
> help, I cannot decompress the JDK 1.2 on my RH 5.2 based distribution.
> The the bzip2 from http://www.muraroa.demon.co.uk/ does a core dump
> on my system.
>
> Why not distribute in a format everybody can han
On Sun, 6 Jun 1999, Lutz Mueller wrote:
> Many thanks for bringing the JDK 1.2 to Linux, but ...
A bzip2 RPM came with my RedHat 5.2 box. Did you try to install that?
> help, I cannot decompress the JDK 1.2 on my RH 5.2 based distribution.
> The the bzip2 from http://www.muraroa.demon.co.uk/
Many thanks for bringing the JDK 1.2 to Linux, but ...
help, I cannot decompress the JDK 1.2 on my RH 5.2 based distribution.
The the bzip2 from http://www.muraroa.demon.co.uk/ does a core dump
on my system.
Why not distribute in a format everybody can handle, like gzip? I think
a Java Jdk di
> > Is TYA headed for the great, big, bit bucket in the sky? :-(
>
> I very much doubt it. The JVM can run with multiple JITs, and TYA can
> run with multiple JVMs.
TYA surely isn't for the bit bucket. It is always nice to have an
option. Could you imagine that Sun's JIT has quite a few bugs T
Well I have been using the jdk1.2v2 glibc2.1 version for about a day
now and have these observations. Things like the demo/applet/Java2Demo
run really slow. On the same system in windows using the win32 jdk1.2
I get about 30fps but in linux I get about 2fps.
Also twice the new jdk has caused
Mike Greaves wrote:
> Excuse me for asking, but am I to understand that Blackdown JDK1.2, as
> of prerelease 2, now includes a JIT and uses it by default? And that
> this JIT is based on Sun source code - i.e. the same one included with
> the Solaris JDK1.2??
Yes, as of prerelease 1.
> What are
Stefan Proels wrote:
>
> > cannot find the JIT (sunwjit) and that it is switching to interpreted
> chmod 755 jdk1.2/jre/lib/i386/libsunwjit.so
^^^ -- ?
Excuse me for asking, but am I to understand that Blackdown JDK1.2, as
of prerelease 2, now inclu
21 matches
Mail list logo
