Dear All,
I'm using RedHat 6.1 (with GNOME). When I was trying to install Oracle8i
(with doing ./runInstaller), I got the following message:
"Initializing Java Virtual Machine from /usr/local/jre/bin/jre. Please
wait
Error in CreateOUIProcess():-1: Bad address"
FYI, I've already installed J
Tony Dean wrote:
> 1) Sun owns the Java trademark. They have published the VM spec and
> the language spec. They permit rogue ports from the specs.
There is already an excellent "rogue port" in the Kaffe project,
although "cleanroom implementation" is a better term. Interestingly,
even the sp
Please forgive me for the abruptness of my original message.
I was rushing out the door when I sent it.
What else other than my original email is needed to answer the
question, "Why is javac segfaulting?"
Typing "java" at the # prompt simply, and correctly, I think,
dumps a list of command line
Hi there!
First i would like to apologise about the newbie
question but i couldnt find info about such topic.
Is there a way to pass a Complex Object from
java to legacy code using jni?
Thanks in advance.
Rodrigo Gidra
Nelson,
There are a number of possible scenarios that your comments could blossom
into.
Nelson Minar wrote:
There are deeper problems lurking underneath, though, having to do
with Sun's control of Java. Sun isn't interested in the ultimate goals
of free software, and they're powerful enough to
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 07:44:24PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I had a single communication with the VP of engineering at inprise, telling
> me that they were interested in dedicated some resources to assist with the
> port. I provided him with Steve Byrne's contact information and that was
Paolo Ciccone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:55:25AM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
>
> > What I don't understand is: Why didn't Inprise ever contact or support (testing
>and bugfixing) the
> > Blackdown team in their porting effort, if they just wanted to have (and this
>
This is my system & what I did:
- My kernel is 2.2.12 on Mandrake 6.0
- Before I installed jdk 1.2.2, I upgraded glibc 2.1.1
to 2.1.2 by applying an rpm of the pre-compiled
binaries. I did a test upgrade, which worked ok,
then applied these binary rpms:
- glibc-devel-2.1.2-17
- glibc-
Blackdown team,
Here's a copy of a message I dropped at javalobby. Just want to let
you know there are still a lot of people who really appreciate your
work, and I hate to see you guys misacknowledged. I'm sure there are
hundreds or thousands of Linux users who feel just like me.
I would really
Fools fighting over scraps while the m$ buzzards eat caviar
Jacob Nikom wrote:
> I still cannot completely agree with Brian - credit not
> "should be given", but must be given. If you work for the
> company and you patented something, the company owns the
> patent, but you still own your name on
Here ! Here !!!
I second the statement made in this memo. We silent, but grateful users
in the linux community own you and the entire blackdown team a case of
beer -- each!
Thanks
david
Jo Uthus wrote:
> Since we all (to some extent) agree that we have to have a JDK/JRE
> 1.2(.2 or whatever) ru
Hi Rachit,
> how does it compare to the other two java ports at high connections?
> your page i assume wasn't updated after you ran the 4000 connections
> test. just curious.
IBM JDK 1.1.8 on Linux can't get over 500 connections (a bug confirmed
by IBM). Blackdown JDK 1.2.2 RC3 fails at just ov
It's available on Volano's site at http://www.volano.com/benchmarks.html
Peter
Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>
> Is there any way I can get a hold of the benchmark software? I'd like to
> try the tya compiler with blackdown's jdk and see how it stacks up.
>
---
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 07:14:11PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> > Paolo Ciccone writes:
>
> Paolo> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:55:25AM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
> >> What I don't understand is: Why didn't Inprise ever contact or
> >> support (testing and bugfixing) the Blackd
Hi Joseph,
> Is there any way I can get a hold of the benchmark software? I'd like to
> try the tya compiler with blackdown's jdk and see how it stacks up.
See the section called "Download" at:
http://www.volano.com/benchmarks.html
John Neffenger
--
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 07:52:02PM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 07:20:46PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> > No, sunwjit and javacomp are two different products. sunwjit is what
> > we get from Sun (actually they bought this JIT from another company)
> > as a binary. ja
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
>
> > Peter Schuller writes:
>
> >> Since I cannot currently use the Blackdown 1.2.2 RC3 release as
> >> it requires glibc 2.1.2 and I am currently stuck at 2.1.1, I
> >> decided to try the Imprise 1.2.2 RC1 JDK. The first thing I
> >> have noticed i
I ran a few benchmarks to compare the different JVM's out there, on the
SPEC benchmarks plus two of our internal benchmarks, sablecc (a parser
generator), and soot, a frozen version of our analysis framework.
Here are the results. These results are not scientific; in particular, I
only ran each
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 06:54:44PM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:29:04AM -0800, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:55:25AM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
> >
> > > What I don't understand is: Why didn't Inprise ever contact or support (testing
>and bugfixin
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> > Jan Buchmann writes:
>
> Jan> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:29:04AM -0800, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> >> It's called Borland JIT :). Seriously the latest JIT is
> >> included in the Sun/Inprise JDK but you can use it with any
> >> other JDK 1.2 if you wan
Is there any way I can get a hold of the benchmark software? I'd like to
try the tya compiler with blackdown's jdk and see how it stacks up.
John Neffenger wrote:
> I updated the Volano Report to include Blackdown JDK 1.2.2 RC3 on Red
> Hat 6.1 and Inprise JDK 1.2.2 RC1 on Red Hat 6.0:
>
> Th
I opened what I think is the last bug holding back the VolanoMark
network scalability tests under Blackdown JDK 1.2.2:
Bug Id 1604, "Segmentation violation with 1020 timeout sockets"
http://www.blackdown.org/cgi-bin/jdk/incoming?id=1604
I guess we report these bugs to Sun and Inprise through
> Peter Schuller writes:
>> Since I cannot currently use the Blackdown 1.2.2 RC3 release as
>> it requires glibc 2.1.2 and I am currently stuck at 2.1.1, I
>> decided to try the Imprise 1.2.2 RC1 JDK. The first thing I
>> have noticed is that the font rendition is terrible co
> Since I cannot currently use the Blackdown 1.2.2 RC3 release as it
> requires glibc 2.1.2 and I am currently stuck at 2.1.1, I decided to try
> the Imprise 1.2.2 RC1 JDK. The first thing I have noticed is that the
> font rendition is terrible compared to 1.1.8. The font is huge and
> ugly, no
> Jan Buchmann writes:
Jan> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:29:04AM -0800, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
>> It's called Borland JIT :). Seriously the latest JIT is
>> included in the Sun/Inprise JDK but you can use it with any
>> other JDK 1.2 if you want. At present time there are no plan
> Paolo Ciccone writes:
Paolo> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:55:25AM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
>> What I don't understand is: Why didn't Inprise ever contact or
>> support (testing and bugfixing) the Blackdown team in their
>> porting effort, if they just wanted to have (and thi
You could do almost the same thing nd possibly appease Sun at the same
time by setting up a system similar to how XFree86 is set up. Create
the "Blackdown Organization" who is able to sign NDAs and whatever
other legal crap that Sun requires. For those that want to help on
the port, they join th
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:29:04AM -0800, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:55:25AM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
>
> > What I don't understand is: Why didn't Inprise ever contact or support (testing
>and bugfixing) the
> > Blackdown team in their porting effort, if they just wanted
"a b" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I wonder what would happen if any of the Blackdown developers had put a GPL
>license in any part of their code fixes?
If Blackdown had GPLed their patches, then any code that incorporated
them would be GPL as well.
I believe that Blackdown did not have the optio
I still cannot completely agree with Brian - credit not
"should be given", but must be given. If you work for the
company and you patented something, the company owns the
patent, but you still own your name on the patent. Company
cannot change it, otherwise the patent will be invalidated.
Sun
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:55:25AM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
> What I don't understand is: Why didn't Inprise ever contact or support (testing and
>bugfixing) the
> Blackdown team in their porting effort, if they just wanted to have (and this seems
>to be the case)
> a production quality JDK1.
a b wrote:
> Hi
>
> I wonder what would happen if any of the Blackdown developers had put a GPL
> license in any part of their code fixes?
>
> How would that affect Sun's Community Source license?
Aparat from the fact that such an act is illegal according to the
non-commercial license agreement,
Hi,
while running the jre1.2 with metal l&f I get "d"s instead of
"ä"s in dialog titles -- but no warnings or errors from the jvm.
Anybody got an idea how to fix this? Seems X somehow get's the
wrong font (which?).
Thanks in advance
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTE
I personally must say that I am the most happy person since blackdowns RC2
came out recently. It works absolutely stable, without problems (yes, I've
solved the Zapd-Dingbats-hit-me-dead-problem). Very good work, very stable.
Today Sun anounced with Inprise the release of Java2 RC1 for linux. Not
Jacob Nikom wrote:
>
> I am eager to buy it. Could you tell us when it will be available?
>
> Jacob Nikom
The publisher is advertising a 12/21/1999 publication date; there should
be general shelf availability in January. I'll send a note to the list
when it's available.
Nathan
>
> Nathan Mey
I am eager to buy it. Could you tell us when it will be available?
Jacob Nikom
Nathan Meyers wrote:
>
> Man, it's hard to keep up with this business!
>
> When the industry's first book about Java/Linux hits the streets in a
> few weeks, it'll have several chapters about Blackdown and the Black
Hi
I wonder what would happen if any of the Blackdown developers had put a GPL
license in any part of their code fixes?
How would that affect Sun's Community Source license?
Maybe GPL was a good idea after all? Now we see what they mean by
protecting your rights to give away your sof
take me out of this listing please
__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Hi !
I am
using jdk117_v3 on RH6.1 and RH6.0
.
Here jdb hangs if I set
the THREADS_FLAG to native , but it works properly if it equals to
green.
Any info on this?
Please let me know whether java native threads works properly on RH6.1 and
RH6.0.
Thanks in advanc
>
Another big Ditto from me.
>
> James Seigel wrote:
>
> > I think this group knows who to credit for the work in the trenches when no one
> > else was supporting us developers on the Linux platform. As always I give thanks
> > to blackdown for their supreme efforts to make this real!
> >
I al
Hi Blackdown guys,
I was noticed the problem which JDK 1.2.2 RC2 had (0x8000 / -1).
But still a problem is preventing the RC3 from working
with some JITs. For instance, with Inprise JIT
(libjavacomp.so) for JDK 1.2pre2 which is released in
Oct, it contained in Inprese/Sun 1.2.2 RC1 and shuJI
To the blackdown team:
Praise, Respect and Many Thanks for the great work guys. Don't give up
the fight.
To inprise:
As derek says, "watch your back"
To sun:
Don't ever expect to get respect in the community with moves like this
one - and I don't mean the "community" that the pathetic community
Hi,
are there any plans from blackdown or Sun/Inprise to support Java 2
on 2.0.x kernels (or libc5 systems)? Not everybody wants to
update his system...
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen
Oh guys ! Wake up !
Hands up all those who believe that David and Goliath have the same goals
and ethics.
As my old Grandma used to say: He who expects to be treated by the same
rules in life that he himself follows, is a damn fool.
Many are directly comparing the guys at Blackdown with the _co
With all the recent news regarding Java/Linux (and being hit by the
idea that there really isn't any useable open source Java engine), I
became interested in the general topic of JITs, Hotspot-type engines
(what's it called .. dynamic compilation?) and bytecode interpretors.
Can anyone recommend
I updated the Volano Report to include Blackdown JDK 1.2.2 RC3 on Red
Hat 6.1 and Inprise JDK 1.2.2 RC1 on Red Hat 6.0:
The Volano Report
http://www.volano.com/report.html
Kevin Hendricks told me he already knows the fix for the SIGSEGV problem
at just over 1000 connections (see Table 2). W
Since we all (to some extent) agree that we have to have a JDK/JRE
1.2(.2 or whatever) running on Linux, I must say to Juergen first that
you (since you're the most profiled member of the Blackdown team at
the time being) have done a great job !
To Juergen (and the rest of the Blackdown-team):
We don't have to argue about native vs. green threads since the
Blackdown JDK 1.2.2 release does both.
I understand why people need native threads, but I need green threads on
Linux for handling a large number of dedicated connections to a pure
Java server (see
http://developer.java.sun.com/dev
Hello to all of you,
I've read the most of the discussion about the blackdown-inprise issue and I'm really
annoyed (even
more i'm pissed off) about the way SUN treated the blackdown-team.
Now I have some questions and most of them are to SUN-representatives on this list:
What I don't understan
> Paolo Ciccone writes:
Paolo> example. JBuilder has Emacs emulation, with the standard
Paolo> Swing of 1.2.2 if you press Alt-d or Ctrl-space Swing will
Paolo> pass also the "d" or the blank in the editor. While the
Paolo> event is processed correctly the extra character is
50 matches
Mail list logo
