On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Dan Kegel wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > But they have no logical reason to share stack memory. I was assuming
> > the os did things logically. My mistake.
>
> Just curious: do you know of any operating systems that don't
> share the stack memory for different thread
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Dan Kegel wrote:
So I just have to set that line in /boot/config-2.4.18-14 and reboot?
No; you have to install your kernel source,
read the file /usr/src/linux-2.4/README,
copy that config file to /usr/src/linux-2.4/.config,
edit it not manually b
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Dan Kegel wrote:
> >
> > I was under the impression that since linux made ever thread a seperate
> > process they each had their own stack and only shared the heap memory.
>
> Threads share the entire memory space. That's what makes them threads
> instead of processes.
But
Hi,
the question should be evident from the subject: if I download
the 1.4.1_01 compiled with gcc 3.2, where can I find the
jai and j3d packages binary compatible with it? (I guess the
one are on the ftp servers are compatible with the version
compiled with gcc 2.95, isn't it?)
Best regards
Andrea
