> Java also has the advantage that Perl (AFAIK--I'm not even a Perl newbie)
> lacks in that Java has JNI, which would allow you to "call down" to C++
> code if necessary.
Not true actually: a lot of the big Perl modules have cores written in
C with stubs in Perl to allow one to call them easi
>
> On Wed, 18 Nov 1998, Glenn Valenta wrote:
>
> > >Hey, did everyone notice that Sun won it's java suit against microsoft
> > >today? The judge granted us an injunction and Microsoft has to start
> > >shipping a Java implementation that complies with the test suites or
> > >quit shipping win
Thanks chaps: the operators are now doing what I hoped.
Learnt a valuable lesson today: if one is going to twiddle
bits it helps if one is familiar with the bits one is
twiddling. :)
J.
+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+
www:http://www.elephant.org/~azazel/
mail: [EMAIL
m.err.print("\n");
return l;
}
}
n:
n>>8:
n>>>8:
n<<8:
n: 00001111
n>>8: 111
+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+
www:http://www.elephant.org/~azazel/
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+
Pico? Pah! Try vi. Grr! :)
Az.
Dustin Lang wrote:
>
> > What development tool do you use to help on daily coding?
>
> pico :)
>
> dstn.
Erm, you didn't want the libc version if you're running 5.0. I know
from bitter experience: all sorts of things started crashing after I
installed 5.4.44. You want the glibc version and to try to get rid
of libc 5.4.44 and co.. I took the rather drastic measure of scrub-
bing my box and upgradi
I've just installed the JDK1.1 prerelease again and this time I sorted
out the problem that cropped up last time, that I needed to have the
Netscape archive (${MOZILLA_HOME}/java/classes/java40.jar) before the
JDK archive in $CLASSPATH, - or so I thought.
This had the unfortunate effect of confus
According to the FAQ (http://www.place.org/~stevemw/java/FAQ/FAQ-java-linux.html):
> 2.5 When is the JDK 1.2 Going to be Released for Linux?
>
> According to Steve Byrne on Monday, May 26th 1998:
>
> JavaSoft is trying very hard to get a license set up with an external person
> to co
> > Also, is there a working Netscape for RH5.0?
> >
>
> My copy is 4.05, and it works fine.
Has anyone managed to get JDK1.1-complete preview version
of 4.05 working under RH 5.0/5.1? The Java was decidedly
flaky, when I installed it.
Az. >-)=
Doh! I *knew* there was something I was missing: I
should have read the FAQ. Fixed in five minutes. :)
Thanks, folks.
Az. >-)=
Stephen Wynne wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Azazel writes:
>
> Help? I've installed jdk1.1.5-v7 under Redhat 5.1 and
Help? I've installed jdk1.1.5-v7 under Redhat 5.1 and all
of a sudden (it was fine under 5.0) I get the following:
> [azazel@anubis ~/misc]$ javac Test.java
> No library path set.
I'm sure I'm being an idiot but I just can't see the wood
for the trees at the moment.
Ta,
Az.
Might JDBC give you the access you need to your data? I know it's
helped me avoid
a fair bit of VB.
13 matches
Mail list logo
