I have been unable to get a JComboBox to report any Key/Focus Events to
listeners. I have checked the archives on the mailing list and the bug reports
and couldn't find the problem reported. I have encountered the problem in both
the Windows and Linux JVM's so I'm wondering at this point whether
I could help you; now that
> it's looking like Sybase I'm getting farther and farther out of my watter,
> aside from basic JNI issues. -=Chris
>
> At 14:57 10/18/99 -0600, Brandon Anderson wrote:
> >I'm sorry, but I'm obviously missing something. What *.so
library. Maybe
I'm missing your point, but please enlighten me.
On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, Chris Abbey wrote:
> At 12:46 10/17/99 -0600, Brandon Anderson wrote:
> >Sorry I meant to indicate that it dies on the very last line on the
> >DriverManager.getConnection( ...) statement. I
On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, Chris Abbey wrote:
> At 23:21 10/16/99 -0600, Brandon Anderson wrote:
> >
> >OK, here is the thread dump, but like I already wrote in the previous
> >post I only get this while running java_g so I don't know if its really
> >relevant.
&g
OK, here is the thread dump, but like I already wrote in the previous
post I only get this while running java_g so I don't know if its really
relevant.
*** panic: "../../../../src/share/javavm/runtime/classresolver.c", line
1285: assertion failure
SIGABRT 6* abort (generated by abort(3) rou
automatigically starts
to output what functions its executes).
On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Weiqi Gao wrote:
> Brandon Anderson wrote:
> >
> > OK, so I found out that not all the code is compiled with javac_g. Is
> > there any way to get around having to compile all the code with javac
ideas?
On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Brandon Anderson wrote:
> I did recompile everything using javac_g, but that is when I get the nasty RMI
> thread dump. I would assume that the other code connecting through RMI doesn't
> have to be recompiled using the java_g. But that is pretty much ir
t where it would accept RMI
connections.
I'm running the rmiregistry_g and all the code that is currently being used has
been compiled with javac_g, so I just don't get what's wrong.
On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Michael Sinz wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Oct 1999 15:47:02 -0600 (MDT), Brandon A
Well, I tried to run my project with java_g as suggested. Unfortunately now I
get a horrible RMI related thread dump. I was just wondering what exactly is
the debug version of the jdk. Is it a development version or should it
actually run correctly?
Thanx again (in advance).
--
Thanx (to everyone),
That's an easier solution than I was hoping for.
On 16 Oct 1999, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> >>>>> Brandon Anderson writes:
>
> Brandon> I've been trying to get the Runtime.traceMethodCalls()
> Brandon> and the Runt
On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, Robert Simmons wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Gordon Keith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Robert Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 8:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Const in java
>
>
> > [EMAIL
I've been trying to get the Runtime.traceMethodCalls() and the
Runtime.traceInstructions working in Java under linux for quiet some time, and
can't seem to figure out what I'm doing wrong.
I'm starting to wonder if they are implemented at all in the Linux version, or
if I have to do some special
Just in case you have discovered your error. You have an extra close bracket
before the statement your getting the error on. I've marked it in your code
below with a few ***. I'd suggest either doing your brackets in such a way
that they line up, or you learn to proofread your code just a littl
Actually, I believe the problem is related to the fact the NT doesn't support
symbolic links. Almost all the files in the ($JAVA_HOME)/bin directory are
symbolic links to .java_wrapper. The only two files that aren't symbolic links
are .java_wrapper and java-rmi.cgi (atleast on 1.2).
On Mon, 2
ecause they don't happen to exist on Solaris boxes
> :-(. But do you *really* have a 1024-bit deep display??? Could you post
> the results of running xdpyinfo? This I gotta see :-).
>
> Nathan
>
>
> Brandon Anderson wrote:
> >
> > I've been trying to get J
I've been trying to get Java 1.2 pre v2 to run on my Redhat 5.2 box. I
evidently have run into some problems that make no sense to me at all, and
was wondering if anyone else had any suggestions.
The application that I'm trying to get to run connects to another machine
and then should show a sim
1.1.7 v3. Any suggestions on why I can no longer
connect? Thanx in advance.
Trying to be happy is like trying to build a machine for which the only
specification is that it should run noiselessly.
B
rfectly on java 1.1.7. Any Ideas? Thanx in advance.
Trying to be happy is like trying to build a machine for which the only
specification is that it should run noiselessly.
Brando
18 matches
Mail list logo
