Re: Any jvm (even 32-bit) works on x86-64?

2004-01-31 Thread David D. Lucas
I don't diagree, the kernel should not oops. I just was not sure if you were testing the kernel or the JVM. Dave Juergen Kreileder wrote: David D. Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: My guess is the JVM is compiling byte code into machine code. The JIT compiler is probably producing b

Re: Any jvm (even 32-bit) works on x86-64?

2004-01-31 Thread David D. Lucas
My guess is the JVM is compiling byte code into machine code. The JIT compiler is probably producing bad code for your platform. If you want to just run Java without the JIT, try using the -Xint (interpreted mode only) option. This should not crash while running. If that works, then you can

Re: focus problems under linux

2003-06-06 Thread David D. Lucas
You may have already checked this, but see if the Window Behavior for the window manager is "Focus follows Mouse". Set it to an alternative like "Click To Focus". It could be something with the window manager. Best Wishes, Dave Matt Avery wrote: I have had some very strange problems running Jav

Re: Where is the enviroment files for JBuilder4.0?

2001-02-01 Thread David D. Lucas
Yang, This is probably not the correct place to ask a vendor specific question unrelated to the JVM. However, try looking at the FAQ from http://www.borland.com/jbuilder . (Hint: look under the bin directory) Best Wishes, Dave -- +

Re: Java GUI (JFC) locks the machine

2000-08-15 Thread David D. Lucas
I use TogetherJ without a problem (single i686). I am using both Blackdown JDK 1.2.2 RC4 and Sun JDK 1.3 beta. First try running with JIT disabled. Also, make sure you are picking up the right JVM as it runs. When it first comes up, expecially TJ 4.0, you should be able to see the JVM that is r

Re: final variables in constructors

1999-07-15 Thread David D. Lucas
Kontorotsui wrote: > > aClass extends aSuperClass > { > final int v = 1; > > aClass() > { > super(v); > } > } First off, my understanding of the question is why doesn't v exist when passed into super. "super" is not a method call like everything else. It is a special keyword and a