nged.
- It could be interesting to show the results using Sparc HW, in order
to see how things change from Solaris 9-x86 to Solaris9-Sparc with the
64-bit JVM.
Regards,
Marco Trevisan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Hi,
Eugene Rosenzweig wrote:
However the code size would grow dramatically, for every java class there
would be an executable cache which would probably more than double the
effective size of the class takes up on disk.
And there is another reason for not doing this. Here is a snapshot of:
http:
Hi,
Remember that IBM-jvm needs the following environment variable:
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5
You could try this and see if page faults continue arising.
Regards,
Marco Trevisan
Narendra Sankar wrote:
hi
I ran a very simple thread creation benchmark on various vms to find out how
useful
server performance.
Thanks again, bye!
Marco Trevisan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s/pthreads/, they say: "This
release is fully suitable as a replacement for LinuxThreads by either a
single user or group or an entire distribution."
Does it mean that if I patch the kernel and install it on my system, my
JVM will use it? I guess it's not so easy :
