Thanks!
On Wed, 1 Jul 1998, Christopher Seawood wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 1998, Marcus Johnson wrote:
>
> > Yes, yes, but will someone answer the question? What is the history here?
>
> I'm not sure why it matters but the brief and possibly incorrect story is
> this
Yes, yes, but will someone answer the question? What is the history here?
Marcus
On Tue, 30 Jun 1998, Juan Carlos wrote:
> Marcus, go at www.blackdown.org/java-linux.html
>
>
>
>
> ---Marcus Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Could someone expl
Could someone explain to me (a newcomer) why there was appearently a big
shift from blackdown.org to java-linux.org and then back to blackdown.org
and now java-linux.org seems to be down?
Thanks,
Marcus
Daniele,
I got a chance to try this suggestion. The suggester says it worked for
him, but it didn't work for me on my Win95 machine running Sun's JDK 1.1.5
. Have you come up with anything further?
Marcus
On Mon, 15 Jun 1998, Marcus Johnson wrote:
> Daniele,
>
> I sha
Daniele,
I shared this problem on another Java forum and here's the first answer I
got. I haven't had a chance to try out the suggestion, but here it is:
Posted by Surya Duggirala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on June 15, 1998 at 16:19:12:
In Reply to: Problem extending inner classes
In the actionPerf
Check out http://WDVL.Internet.com/Authoring/Java/
On Mon, 15 Jun 1998, Paris Flegas wrote:
> Where can i find a good and easy t understand tutorial for java except
> that in http://java.sun.com??
>
>
Hi Glenn,
To expand on what Rani said, there are certain classes and methods which
were done one way in JDK 1.0.2 and have been dramatically changed in 1.1 .
When you get a deprecated warning on a class/method the compiler is
telling you've used an old way of doing things which is in the process
Okay, I haven't had a chance to thoroughly analyze this, but I can see
that there is something wrong with the super.actionPerformed (aevt);
line. My guess is that somehow the action event you're passing to the is
not properly instantiated, or something along the lines of needing to
supply a no a
I was having problems with RMI w/ Netscape Communicator 4.05 w/ JDK 1.1.2
so I upgraded the JDK to 1.1.5 by using the DevEdge preview version. It
seems to be helping.
see the "new" item at:
http://home.netscape.com/download/index.html?cp=hmp06sdow
Marcus
On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, Jerry Solomon x2761
Yeeehaa! I tried the JDK 1.1.5v7 on Debian 1.1 and javac actually
executed out of the box, with no configuration! Maybe that sounds like no
big deal, but I count that as an enormous victory after fumbling around
with 1.1.5v5 for quite a while. I'll report back after more testing if
there's any w
On Thu, 28 May 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> Jauvane Cavalcante de Oliveira writes:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > > Whoops - you need the libc5 version, for sure. Debian 2.0 (hamm) is the first
>with
> > > real glibc support.
> >
> > That's not right. I use Debian 1.3.1 and the glib 1.1.5v5 works j
Could someone explain to me (a newcomer) why there was appearently a big
shift from blackdown.org to java-linux.org and now java-linux.org seems to
be down? There were some valuable web pages at java-linux.org I was using
to understand how to install and configure the jdk. I'm not finding the
sa
On Thu, 28 May 1998, Paul Reavis wrote:
> the FAQ (currently at
> http://www.place.org/~stevemw/java/FAQ/FAQ-java-linux.html
> ) for general issues.
That reference is like gold! Thanks gobs for that. I read through part
of it and it explained what all this glibc vs libc5 stuff was. I went
b
I'm trying to set up the Java JDK 1.1.5 on Debian, and I'm a newbie to
Linux, so I turn to y'all for help. I'm not the administrator, the admin
is not very available and I'm a newbie at Linux/Unix admin stuff, but I
have uncovered this much at least.
* when I start I new shell I get the following
14 matches
Mail list logo
