Agree with you, simple is good. This is getting a little blown out of
proportion. My points are as follows:
1. Inprise JBuilder, sitting on top of JDK that Inprise authored.
Good brand. Not involving Blackdown as the market might perceive
that as a dilution (I know finance folks who w
> Well, there doesn't seem to be any dispute that Inprise contacted
> Blackdown repeatedly and was ignored.
Really? I thought this was in dispute.
> I'm sorry you object to the term "conspiracy theory", but one of my
> criteria for using the term is when I see motives being assigned that
> make
Don't believe I mentioned the word conspiracy or even tried to
represent any argument as such. Amazed at how the responses have
represented the "crackpot" perspective so quickly. I don't believe
Sun and Inprise conspired to block blackdown out. I think Inprise
wants it's own presence for its ow
> "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by
> stupidity." (Hanlon's Razor?)
> PR folks working for large organizations typically don't have two
> clues to rub together - not only about techical details and
> development politics, but also about what is really important. I
