Re: JDK 1.4: "Could not create system preferences directory"

2002-08-11 Thread Jesus M. Salvo Jr.
t; I have finally decided to start using JDK 1.4 ( 1.4.1-beta to be exact. > > ). Installed it as root under /usr/local. > > > > When running a Swing app ( under my own account, NOT root ) that was > > originally created with JDK 1.3.1 ( but recompiled for JDK 1.4.1 ), I get &

Re: JDK 1.4: "Could not create system preferences directory"

2002-08-10 Thread Nathan Meyers
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:07:26AM +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote: > > I have finally decided to start using JDK 1.4 ( 1.4.1-beta to be exact. ). > Installed it as root under /usr/local. > > When running a Swing app ( under my own account, NOT root ) that was > originall

JDK 1.4: "Could not create system preferences directory"

2002-08-10 Thread Jesus M. Salvo Jr.
I have finally decided to start using JDK 1.4 ( 1.4.1-beta to be exact. ). Installed it as root under /usr/local. When running a Swing app ( under my own account, NOT root ) that was originally created with JDK 1.3.1 ( but recompiled for JDK 1.4.1 ), I get this: 11/08/2002 10:43:10

Re: JDK 1.4 non-Intel

2002-07-10 Thread proteus99
> > My apologies if this post provokes fear and loathing, but does > anybody subscribed to this list know if anybody is working on a > blackdown 1.4 release on non-Intel platforms (specifically PPC)? the blackdown release for ppc, if there will be any :) , will not have jit enabled. But i thin

JDK 1.4 non-Intel

2002-07-09 Thread Wilhelm *Rafial* Fitzpatrick
My apologies if this post provokes fear and loathing, but does anybody subscribed to this list know if anybody is working on a blackdown 1.4 release on non-Intel platforms (specifically PPC)? -- __ Wilhelm Fitzpa

Re: JDK 1.4 port status

2001-10-23 Thread Jim Hazen
Sounds great. Blackdown rocks. -Jim > Jim Hazen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Back at the end of August it was said that a first Blackdown release > > (beta) of JDK 1.4 would happen in two weeks. It's been a bit longer > > than that. Anyone know what&

Re: JDK 1.4 port status

2001-10-23 Thread Juergen Kreileder
Jim Hazen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Back at the end of August it was said that a first Blackdown release > (beta) of JDK 1.4 would happen in two weeks. It's been a bit longer > than that. Anyone know what's going on? New features (generics, > etc) being crammed

Re: JDK 1.4 port status

2001-09-04 Thread Alex Buell
On 4 Sep 2001, Juergen Kreileder wrote: > > Odd. I have very few problems with Mozilla (I am using 0.9.3), and > > totally love it. It doesn't crash where Netscape *will* crash! I've > > only had Mozilla crash when I've forgotten to initialise it by > > running it as root after installation. > >

Re: JDK 1.4 port status

2001-09-04 Thread Juergen Kreileder
Alex Buell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 30 Aug 2001, Juergen Kreileder wrote: > >> I still have problems with Mozilla on Sparc (even without Java), so >> this might take a couple of days more... (You might be able to use >> Java in Mozilla before that. There's a new Java integration API >>

Re: JDK 1.4 port status

2001-08-30 Thread Alex Buell
On 30 Aug 2001, Juergen Kreileder wrote: > I still have problems with Mozilla on Sparc (even without Java), so > this might take a couple of days more... (You might be able to use > Java in Mozilla before that. There's a new Java integration API for > Mozilla: Waterfall. IIRC it will build with

Re: JDK 1.4 port status

2001-08-29 Thread Juergen Kreileder
Alex Buell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Jim Hazen wrote: > >> I'm currently using Blackdown 1.3.1 and I love it. It runs faster >> (than the Sun version), works better, doesn't crash. Couldn't want >> much more in a JVM. I'm looking forward to Blackdown's take on >> 1.4,

Re: JDK 1.4 port status

2001-08-29 Thread Juergen Kreileder
Jim Hazen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The status page for the Blackdown 1.4 port hasn't been updated in a > while. Is there any new news? Is Blackdown waiting to integrate > the Sun 1.4 beta 2 source? Are they prohibited from releasing > "beta" products by Sun? > > I'm currently using Black

Re: JDK 1.4 port status

2001-08-28 Thread Alex Buell
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Jim Hazen wrote: > I'm currently using Blackdown 1.3.1 and I love it. It runs faster > (than the Sun version), works better, doesn't crash. Couldn't want > much more in a JVM. I'm looking forward to Blackdown's take on 1.4, > but since their promise on 6/25 that a beta wou

JDK 1.4 port status

2001-08-28 Thread Jim Hazen
The status page for the Blackdown 1.4 port hasn't been updated in a while. Is there any new news? Is Blackdown waiting to integrate the Sun 1.4 beta 2 source? Are they prohibited from releasing "beta" products by Sun? I'm currently using Blackdown 1.3.1 and I love it. It runs faster (than the

Status of JDK 1.4 (Merlin) port

2001-04-23 Thread Jim Hazen
What is the status of Blackdown's Merlin port? What is the status of other Blackdown technologies (JMF, JAI, Java3D, etc)? I know someone asked this same question in late March, and updates to the Blackdown pages were promised. I understand that these ports take a tremendous amount of time, and

Re: JDK 1.4

2001-03-20 Thread Juergen Kreileder
>>>>> "Jesus" == Jesus M Salvo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jesus> I have just read an article on JavaWorld about Merlin and Jesus> that a beta of JDK 1.4 is to be released this month. Does Jesus> Blackdown have plans to have their own JDK 1.4

JDK 1.4

2001-03-20 Thread Jesus M. Salvo Jr.
I have just read an article on JavaWorld about Merlin and that a beta of JDK 1.4 is to be released this month. Does Blackdown have plans to have their own JDK 1.4 port to Linux i386/sparc/ppc/etc? There is nothing indicating this on the ports page: http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/ports.html