Re: JDK can't work with recent glibc

1999-01-28 Thread Andreas Jaeger
> Aaron Gaudio writes: Aaron> I wouldn't recommend glibc 2.0.110 (or 111 for that Aaron> matter). Java isn't the only thing it breaks (try compiling a Aaron> C++ program that uses iostreams). It's not ready for prime time Aaron> just yet. You did read the glibc FAQ that comes with glibc2.0.1

Re: JDK can't work with recent glibc

1999-01-28 Thread Aaron Gaudio
I wouldn't recommend glibc 2.0.110 (or 111 for that matter). Java isn't the only thing it breaks (try compiling a C++ program that uses iostreams). It's not ready for prime time just yet. And so the chronicles report that SHUDO Kazuyuki spake thusly unto the masses: > > Hi, > > I've updated gli

Re: JDK can't work with recent glibc

1999-01-28 Thread Andreas Jaeger
> SHUDO Kazuyuki writes: > Hi, > I've updated glibc from 2.0.7 to 2.0.110. > Then JDK 1.1.7v1a can't work at all. > Java command says, > % java > /usr/local/java/bin/i586/green_threads/java: error in loading shared libraries: >/usr/local/java/lib/i586/green_threads/libjava.so: un

JDK can't work with recent glibc

1999-01-28 Thread SHUDO Kazuyuki
Hi, I've updated glibc from 2.0.7 to 2.0.110. Then JDK 1.1.7v1a can't work at all. Java command says, % java /usr/local/java/bin/i586/green_threads/java: error in loading shared libraries: /usr/local/java/lib/i586/green_threads/libjava.so: undefined symbol: _dl_symbol_value Glibc 2.0.7 hav