i've had the same experience with AnyJ. nice product.
rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Riyad Kalla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 11, 1999 7:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Quetion on IDEs
>
>
&
I am sorry maybe I have made a misstake might have mixed up VAJ1.2 preview with
the Linux preview
I am very happy to here that it isn't slow. When I tried it though (about two months
ago) it felt significantly slower than the Win version.
/isaac
Where did you see that the 500 class limit was removed? I've seen no mention of this.
Its certainly present in my copy.
It's not at all slow. Its the fastest one I've tried (I've tried Netbeans and Visual
Cafe mainly).
At 4:49 PM +0200 09/12/1999, Isaac Elias wrote:
> >I'm quite happy with IB
>I'm quite happy with IBM"s Visual Age preview release for Linux, except for a 500
>class limitation and no support for JDK2 yet. It did take some getting used to
>though. You can register for a free download at http://www.ibm.com/developer/java/
>
>Also there's an IDE comparison at
>http://www
I'm quite happy with IBM"s Visual Age preview release for Linux, except for a 500
class limitation and no support for JDK2 yet. It did take some getting used to though.
You can register for a free download at http://www.ibm.com/developer/java/
Also there's an IDE comparison at
http://www.softw
I've used netbeans, jbuilder, and a few others and finally settled on AnyJ.
They are all slow, and have a horrendous startup time, but AnyJ, for me, was
the fastest out of the bunch and most functional, besides being free for Linux
even for commercial developement.
I think they are getting all on
Folks,
In this list some discussion was held about java IDE's on
Linux. Now all IDEs mentioned are java-based. Performance
isn't a thing you can show off with in java, so I wondered
if I should download Jbuilder or Netbean or whatever
similar IDE for use on my 48MB 150Mhz Pentium (Linux)
boz
