Isn't this EXACTLY what he said in the 1st place?
Peter Pilgrim wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > According to the following IBM link (
> > http://www.ibm.com/java/jdk/other/portingplans.html ) JDK 1.3.0 preview
> > for Linux will be available 1Q 2000 with GA early 2Q 2000! Yes!
> >
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> According to the following IBM link (
> http://www.ibm.com/java/jdk/other/portingplans.html ) JDK 1.3.0 preview
> for Linux will be available 1Q 2000 with GA early 2Q 2000! Yes!
>
No it definitely reads EARLY SECOND QUARTER with GA if GA == General
Announcement.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Where can I download the JDK from IBM for Linux?
http://alphaworks.ibm.com
Look for the JVM link -- you can't miss it.
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/linuxjvm
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 8 July 1999 23:37
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: IBM-jdk Where can I get it
>
>
>
> Where can I download
Where can I download the JDK from IBM for Linux?
_
Steve Gee
Java Developer
Maxor National Pharmacies
Information Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
806.324.5540
www.maxor.com
806.324.5400
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
You can upgrade to glibc 2.1 from redhat 6.0 with rpm but you should be
carefull. When there is some problem while installing and you end up with
a half-installed glibc then your system will become unusable. Especially
when you're new fixing such system is not trivial and it would be better
to upg
Justin,
I recently upgraded a RH 5.1 system to RH 6.0
without too much difficultly. I sort of did the brute force
method. I downloaded all the new RPMs and then installed them
one by one, saving most of the libs for last. Then I
quickly rebooted. Aside from a small networking problem
>how would you go about upgrading from glibc 2.0 to 2.1.
>(it is glibc2.0 in redhat5.1, is it?) and is it a trivial matter,
>or can it be very messy? I'm relatively new in Linux.
It's not for the faint hearted, and it can get a bit messy.
Use a 2.1 based distribution if you can.
Check out the n
jools enticknap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> P.S.
>
> Please note that IBM have only appeared to have released a version for glibc
> 2.1 NOT 2.0. So don't bother unless you are running suse 6.1 or Redhat 6.0
> or a glibc 2.1 based system.
Hmm, this is not what I would think, since I'm running
how would you go about upgrading from glibc 2.0 to 2.1.
(it is glibc2.0 in redhat5.1, is it?) and is it a trivial matter,
or can it be very messy? I'm relatively new in Linux.
thanks.
Justin.
jools enticknap wrote:
> >Anybody played around with the IBM-JDK for Linux? I've run one
> >test-prog
>Anybody played around with the IBM-JDK for Linux? I've run one
>test-program that creates 10 threads, allocates an array and puts some
>random numbers in that array. It seems extremely fast. It beats kaffe
>(by a large margin) and even the SUN-JDK on Solaris (with a faster
>processor)!
>
Yep
Hi Aaron, everyone,
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Aaron M. Stromas wrote:
> having read how fast the ibm's jvm is i decided to compile apache jserv
> with it. unfotunately, i was getting a library load errors, "unsatisfied
> symbol: __bzero" in libjava.so. the old trick of defining macro bzero in
> term o
12 matches
Mail list logo
