> Pierre Heroux writes:
Pierre> I am using jdk1.2 Classic VM (build Linux_JDK_1.2_pre-release-v2
Pierre> glibc2.1, native threads, nojit)on RedHat 5.2.
Pierre> I compile a C++ code which invoke JavaVM.
Pierre> g++ simple.cpp -I/usr/local/jdk1.2/include -ljava
Pierre> I g
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Pierre Heroux wrote:
> I am using jdk1.2 Classic VM (build Linux_JDK_1.2_pre-release-v2
> glibc2.1, native threads, nojit)on RedHat 5.2.
>
> I compile a C++ code which invoke JavaVM.
> g++ simple.cpp -I/usr/local/jdk1.2/include -ljava
>
> I get the following message
>
> /u
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Pierre Heroux wrote:
> I am using jdk1.2 Classic VM (build Linux_JDK_1.2_pre-release-v2
> glibc2.1, native threads, nojit)on RedHat 5.2.
RedHat 5.2 comes with glibc 2.0.7 and not with glibc 2.1.x. Please get
the correct JDK release for your platform.
> I compile a C++ co
Am I correct in saying that its dying due to native threads?
Should he pull a "THREADS_FLAG=green" in his shell to
correct this?
Liguo Song wrote:
>
> Dear Friends,
>
> I am having trouble to make JDK1.2 Pre V2 working on my Red Hat 6.0.
>
> Anytime, I tried to use anything from the package,
If I remember correctly, this means that you have to download the the
version of JDK1.2 for glibc2.0. An alternative is to update your Linix
installation to glibc2.1.
Matthias
Ted Neward wrote:
>
> I'm getting the following error when attempting to run javac from the
> prompt:
>
> /usr/local/j
Just wondering if anyone has noticed a huge difference in Java2D
performance between green and native threads? I switched to green
threads this morning to test something because of the native threads
deadlocking problem when using Swing. The green threads version does't
deadlock, but moving an in
"W. Christopher Everhart" wrote:
> I was having some problems with the pre-release of JDK1.2 being very very slow. I
>tested it with NetBeans, and compared the results to a versino of NetBeans with
>JDK1.1.7v3 and noticed that both were slow, but the newer version was even slower.
>
> It ends
Lance Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I thought I would check here before trying to submit a bug report.
> (If I should have gone the other way someone please let me know.)
>
> I loaded JDK 1.2 pre-v2 onto my Debian 2.1 (slink) system. The first
> attempt at running (applet or applicati
Lance,
Two days ago, I just went through the same problems than you. Your glibc
doesn't match the JKD 1.2pre-v2 you have downloaded. I have tried the glibc
2.1 version on a glibc 2.0 system and encountered exactly your problems.
Maybe you made the same mistake?
Rudy
-Original Message-
>From: Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: 27 Jun 1999 20:12:54 -0700
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I have in my Office an Sparc 5 running Linux.
>> Now I want to use this machine for programming in Java.
>>
>> So I'm looking for JDK 1.2 for that machine.
>> Is there already an beta-version availa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have in my Office an Sparc 5 running Linux.
> Now I want to use this machine for programming in Java.
>
> So I'm looking for JDK 1.2 for that machine.
> Is there already an beta-version available for sparc-linux.
>
> If there is one, I would a
I am also facing the same problem. I guess it's because of improper libc version.
My system has Slackware 2.0.34 with libc5.4.44. But jdk1.2 distributions ported so far
are only for glibc libraries. So,
with libc5 one will get the following errors. (I got them as well).
After that, I tried to ins
> José Luis Gonçalves wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> it is possibel this combination, I try and try, nothing ...
> In a Debian system i have succeed ... not in redhat ...
>
> any help ?
I'm running RH 6 and jdk1.2pre2, aside from some Native threading issues
it works great. Make sure you DL the glibc 2.1
José Luis Gonçalves wrote:
> Hi! it is possibel this combination, I try and try, nothing ...In a
> Debian system i have succeed ... not in redhat ... any help ?
Yep! would you get the jdk 1.2 pre2 for glibc 2.1, if not what are you
waintin' for?, if you do what's exactly the problem?
-
Actually, no I did install the glibc2.0 version, I made sure of that. However I
found the problem. I noticed that when I accidentally forgot to exit out of
'su' once and ran the 'java -version', it did NOT complain about not finding
sunwjit... So that told me there might be some access problems on
> Hi, I've just untarred the new jdk on my SuSE 6.1
> and I got an error because it seems that I have no libhpi.so on my
> system.
> Should I have one ? Is it possible to run this JDK on SuSE 6.1 ?
> I searched this thread and I didn't find any previous messages regarding
> this
> library.
This
thanks, I have 117_v3 but I'm wondering when 1.2 will be available.
-- dog writes:
>codea wrt:
>> does any one have and indication as to when a version of the jdk 1.2
>> will be available that is compatible with glibc 2.1? Couldn't find
>> the answer in the archive or FAQs.
>
>jdk117_v2 or jdk1
codea wrt:
> does any one have and indication as to when a version of the jdk 1.2
> will be available that is compatible with glibc 2.1? Couldn't find
> the answer in the archive or FAQs.
jdk117_v2 or jdk117_v3.
dog
--
To UNS
jais,
it seems that you might have a later version of the libstdc file.
look in the /lib directory (or maybe /usr/lib) for the libstdc* files.
you probably have one like libstdc++-lib6.1-1.so.2. if so, do
ln -s libstdc++-lib6.1-1.so.2 libstdc++-lib6.0-1.so.2
tim daly
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On 15-May-99 Robert Williams wrote:
> What changes did you make? Simplicity + JDK1.2 freezes up
> after a few steps through the tutorial example 1 on my Red Hat 5.2 system.
No changes at all. I have a SuSE 6.1, I installed JDK1.2 and the only change I
did was to edit the Simplicity script to m
What changes did you make? Simplicity + JDK1.2 freezes up
after a few steps through the tutorial example 1 on my Red Hat 5.2 system.
Kontorotsui wrote:
> On 13-May-99 Jeffery S. Norman wrote:
> > Has anyone got JDK 1.2 to work properly with NetBeans x2 or
> > SimplicityRC???
>
> Simplicity doe
On 13-May-99 Jeffery S. Norman wrote:
> Has anyone got JDK 1.2 to work properly with NetBeans x2 or
> SimplicityRC???
Simplicity does work on my system with JDK1.2, I had to change the wrapper
Simplicity script, but works.
---
Andrea "Kontorotsui" Controzzi - MALE Student of Computer Science at
> Has anyone got JDK 1.2 to work properly with NetBeans x2 or
> SimplicityRC???
>
> NetBeans installs properly (SuSE 6.0) and displays the splash screen,
> but then crashes with a SIGSEGV 11.
>
> Thanks for any help.
Hi Jeffery,
In general, version 1.1 of Simplicity for Java has full support f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> This is not true on my system!!!
> JDK1.1.7 *without JIT* worked much faster than JDK1.2 with the JIT (any
> chance
> to check if the JIT was actually activated?)
Well. Specify a non-existent JIT (which will make the JDK run in interpreted
mode) an
Kontorotsui wrote:
> > Sadly, it's also a huge memory hog compared to 1.1.7, so on my machine any
> > larger app is much slower on 1.2.
>
> Yes... damn, it is a nightmare!
>
> I get 11 java processes, each one with size 81512 (RSS: 24324).
> How can this happen??
11 threads, not processes -- th
Am Mon, 10 May 1999 schrieb Kontorotsui:
> On 09-May-99 Peter Schuller wrote:
> >> 2) Should it be S slow??
> > I think so. Unless you're on a P-III 500 mhz with 256 megs of RAM... (I'm
> > guessing this has nothing to do with the Linux port, but rather with JDK 1.2
> > in
> > general).
>
> I
On 09-May-99 Peter Schuller wrote:
>> 2) Should it be S slow??
> I think so. Unless you're on a P-III 500 mhz with 256 megs of RAM... (I'm
> guessing this has nothing to do with the Linux port, but rather with JDK 1.2
> in
> general).
I meant... so slow compared to JDK 1.1.7.
I have a K6-II
Peter Schuller wrote:
>
> The JIT is on by default.
>
> If you do some experimenting, you'll notice that JDK 1.2 with JIT enabled is
> *much* faster than JDK 1.1.7+TYA when it comes to loops and stuff like that.
> But when method calls come into the picture, I've found it to be about as
> fast as
Kontorotsui wrote:
>
> I've installed SuSE 6.1 and the JDK 1.2 now works somehow.
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1) Why does it say this:
>
> Font specified in font.properties not found [--zapf
> dingbats-medium-r-normal--*-%d-*-*-p-*-adobe-fontspecific]
>
> The JDK 1.1.7 never complained about missi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> 2) Should it be S slow??
I think so. Unless you're on a P-III 500 mhz with 256 megs of RAM... (I'm
guessing this has nothing to do with the Linux port, but rather with JDK 1.2 in
general).
> The graphics (swing heavily used) is at least
> twic
Ignacio de Miguel wrote:
> The solution is replace :
>
> java HelloWord
>
> for
>
> java -green HelloWord
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
> Hi,
>
> I have downloaded the JDK 1.2 from blackdown.org. and I tried to run the
> JDK 1.2 JFC demo (FileChooserDemo). But I got an Linker error as follows:
>
> Exception in thread "main"
> java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkerError:/usr/jdk1.2/jre/lib/i386/libfontmanager.so:
> libstdc++-lib6.0-1.so.2:
On Thu, 1 Apr 1999, Joe Lin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have downloaded the JDK 1.2 from blackdown.org. and I tried to run the
> JDK 1.2 JFC demo (FileChooserDemo). But I got an Linker error as follows:
>
> Exception in thread "main"
> java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkerError:/usr/jdk1.2/jre/lib/i386/libfontma
no library, symbolic link libstdc++-libc6.0-1.so.2 to libstdc++.so.2.8.0.
it's ok.
> Hi,
>
> I have downloaded the JDK 1.2 from blackdown.org. and I tried to run the
> JDK 1.2 JFC demo (FileChooserDemo). But I got an Linker error as follows:
>
> Exception in thread "main"
>
java.lang.Unsatisfied
Lars Rusdorf writes:
> Hi,
>
> - download a libc5-version of jdk 1.2 (is there one ?)
There won't be one. We'll have to support glibc 2.0 and glibc 2.1; libc5 is
not something that we will have time to deal with.
Steve
--
Dear Daniele,
Did you get any answers on your CORBA problem? I too am experiencing the same
anomaly. I'm using RedHat 5.2 Linux with JDK117_v1a, with Orbacus 3.1.2. I
get your error when I run the Client on a WindowsNT box, with the HelloWorld
Server running on my Linux box. When the client a
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 30, GUEYE Dame wrote:
> Can you help me with this error i get when i type java :
> /usr/rzrapp/jdk1.2/bin/i386/native_threads/java: error in loading shared
> libraries: /usr/rzrapp/jdk1.2/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so: undefined symbol:
> __divdi3
i think you used the glibc-version of
Please discard my previos message about the InitialPort and remote
host. I happend to use the wrong window when testing... *blush*
(solaris -> solaris...)
I can only confirm that there is a problem with jdk1.2 pre-v1 and
jdk1.2 solaris (final production release).
Sorry for any inconvenience
=> I have installed jdk1.2 version pre-v1 for i386 on my Redhat 5.2 linux
=> distribution.
=>
=> The simple hello world example of the java tutorial at the address:
=> http://www.javasoft.com/docs/books/tutorial/idl/hello/index.html
=>
=> gives me an error when i execute the server and the clien
"Daniele Sacchetti Matr.1783" wrote:
>
> I have installed jdk1.2 version pre-v1 for i386 on my Redhat 5.2 linux
> distribution.
>
> The simple hello world example of the java tutorial at the address:
> http://www.javasoft.com/docs/books/tutorial/idl/hello/index.html
>
> gives me an error when i
Steve,
I have gotten 1.2 to run with the 2.2 kernel installed on RedHat 5.2. I
believe that Steve Byrne mentioned on this list that the multicasting bug
was fixed in the 2.2 kernel. Unfortunately, I have not been able to do
much testing with 1.2 because it does not like my video card. I am usi
On Tue, Mar 09, Mark Minas wrote:
> thanks for your work on porting JDK 1.2 to Linux. I've downloaded JDK
> 1.2 pre-v1 for i386 and have tried to run it on a Pentium PC with 2.0.36
> kernel (SuSE 6.0 distribution). Everything is running fine as long as no
> X11 window has to be opened. In that ca
RTFM
The workaround was posted many messages ago
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Log in as root and run these two commands.
% g++ -shared -o /usr/local/lib/libstdc++-libc6.0-1.so.2 -lm
% ldconfig
After doing that it worked on my RedHat 5.2 box.
Mo DeJong
dejong at cs.umn.edu
On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Mark Minas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your work on porting JDK 1.2 to Linux.
David Cougle wrote:
>
> It seems that jdk 1.2 is ready for x86 machines with 2.2.x(no kernel
> bug). You cannot release it just to us?
I believe that is what they have done, check the mirrors.
mvh
mike.
--
#include
When the jdk1.2 diffs are released, do we need a working jdk1.2 to do the
build? and if so, how was the first port built?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
On 17 Feb 1999, Ulrich Kortenkamp wrote:
> I just noticed a message on http://www.javalobby.org saying that the
> JDK-1.2 source is available now. Maybe that's useful for all the
> people that do not want to wait for the linux port ;-)
Yes, and then we'll get a million posts instead of people wh
> "SB" == Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SB> I'll do something that I'm going to no doubt regret in the
SB> fullness of time: disclose my plans ahead of time.
That's great, thanks.
--Paolo
Nathan Meyers writes:
> Tony Pujals wrote:
>
> > Ouch! ;-)
> >
> > (But I'd still like to know what happened to the web site information?)
> >
> > Tony
>
> Fair enough desire. Those of us who've been on the list awhile have endured
> frequent storms of "where is JDK1.2?" activity, a
I have the same problem-unsubscribe!!
At 01:36 PM 2/16/99 -0500, Esteban Lugo Perea wrote:
>
>please somebody help me. A hacker suscribed me on this list and I don't
>know how to unsuscribe
>
>On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Nathan Meyers wrote:
>
>> Tony Pujals wrote:
>>
>> > Not long ago (not much more t
Well guys - I too am desperate to see JDK1.2 (so I can stop developing on my NT box
at work and get back to Linux) But I just wanted to say thanks to all you porters
out there putting in the hours to get us a port at all. It's appreciated
Joel McCarty
Nathan Meyers wrote:
> Tony Pujals wrote:
>
Tony Pujals wrote:
> Ouch! ;-)
>
> (But I'd still like to know what happened to the web site information?)
>
> Tony
Fair enough desire. Those of us who've been on the list awhile have endured
frequent storms of "where is JDK1.2?" activity, and perhaps our fuses have
become a little short. We'
please somebody help me. A hacker suscribed me on this list and I don't
know how to unsuscribe
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Nathan Meyers wrote:
> Tony Pujals wrote:
>
> > Not long ago (not much more than a week ago), the web site had some
> > information about the 1.2 port. Where did it go?...
> >
>
On Feb 16, 10:14am, Nathan Meyers wrote:
> Subject: Re: JDK 1.2 Snapshots???
> Tony Pujals wrote:
> > (If this issue has already been discussed, then I apologize in advance for
> > not researching the archives.)
>
> The issue has been discussed extensively... see the ar
Ouch! ;-)
(But I'd still like to know what happened to the web site information?)
Tony
At 10:14 AM 2/16/99 +, you wrote:
>Tony Pujals wrote:
>
>> Not long ago (not much more than a week ago), the web site had some
>> information about the 1.2 port. Where did it go?...
>>
>> (If this issue
Tony Pujals wrote:
> Not long ago (not much more than a week ago), the web site had some
> information about the 1.2 port. Where did it go?...
>
> (If this issue has already been discussed, then I apologize in advance for
> not researching the archives.)
The issue has been discussed extensively
Kevin,
thanks you all for your effort and for letting us know.
--Paolo
I agree fully!
Thank you guys for everything.. I REALLY appreciate it!
Jason Hoffman
David Warnock wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> Thank-you for the update but more importantly thank-you to the whole
> team for all the work you are doing on our behalf.
>
> Your efforts are much appreciated.
>
> Dave
>
Kevin,
Thank-you for the update but more importantly thank-you to the whole
team for all the work you are doing on our behalf.
Your efforts are much appreciated.
Dave
David Warnock
Sundayta Ltd
Kevin,
I totaly agree with you and fully appreaciate and am greatful of
the work that has has gone into giving the Linux population
the JDK's to date (I of cause am looking forward to 1.2), I am sure
most of us can cope with using 1.1.7 etc.. for the time being.
I am also sure that the porting t
On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, Kirk Hutchinson wrote:
> For those of you who are not programming on multiple platforms and
> have not begun using the much-balleyhooed Java 2, let me clue you in on
> a few things.
I know exactly what you mean. I am working on a project that combines
Tcl and Jacl and I can t
> JNI - still sucks - especially on Solaris
What sucks about it? Just wondering.
--jason
Mehrdad Jahansoozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --699DB07968A3FE254B61003D
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> I have used the JDK 1.2 .
> There two question I have on porting it to Linux
I have used the JDK 1.2 .
There two question I have on porting it to Linux
1) Are we going to see the same memory management improvement ( All previous
versions of JDK had memory leak, JDK 1.2 is a
great improvement. There are still some minor memory leak in JDK 1.2 which does
kill server appli
Dirk Vanhalle wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Just stay tuned to this list. We're all waiting quite anxiously. I'm
> confident that you will receive plenty of messages as soon as the new JDK
> is available for download.
> Let's give those porters a chance to complete their work and release a
> stable produ
UNSUSCRIBE ME
-Mensaje original-
De: Dirk Vanhalle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: viernes 8 de enero de 1999 6:39
Asunto: Re: jdk 1.2
>Hi.
>
>Just stay tuned to this lis
UNSUSCRIBE ME
-Mensaje original-
De: Dirk Vanhalle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: viernes 8 de enero de 1999 6:39
Asunto: Re: jdk 1.2
>Hi.
>
>Just stay tuned to this lis
UNSUSCRIBE ME
-Mensaje original-
De: Dirk Vanhalle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: viernes 8 de enero de 1999 6:39
Asunto: Re: jdk 1.2
>Hi.
>
>Just stay tuned to this lis
UNSUSCRIBE ME
-Mensaje original-
De: Dirk Vanhalle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: viernes 8 de enero de 1999 6:39
Asunto: Re: jdk 1.2
>Hi.
>
>Just stay tuned to this lis
UNSUSCRIBE ME
-Mensaje original-
De: Dirk Vanhalle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: viernes 8 de enero de 1999 6:39
Asunto: Re: jdk 1.2
>Hi.
>
>Just stay tuned to this lis
Hi.
Just stay tuned to this list. We're all waiting quite anxiously. I'm
confident that you will receive plenty of messages as soon as the new JDK
is available for download.
Let's give those porters a chance to complete their work and release a
stable product !
Be patient.
Dirk.
Stefan Nobis wrote:
> What about JDK 1.2 an Swing? I need Swing - how can i get it work for
> Linux?
You don't need JDK 1.2 to get Swing; JavaSoft has a version for 1.1.
Yes, you'll have to wait for 1.2 to have Swing as part of the core
environment, but you certainly don't have to wait to develo
Stefan
> What about JDK 1.2 an Swing? I need Swing - how can i get it work
for
> Linux?
I don't know the answer for JDK 1.2 or 2.0
But we have been using swing for monmths on Linux with no problems.
Swing is pure java. Download it in your preferred format - it is just
a .jar file - add it to y
Apparently there will be changes in the license soon :
http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/news/0,4153,375508,00.html
Alexander
On Sun, Dec 06, 1998 at 11:34:54PM -0800, Matt Welsh wrote:
>
> JDK 1.2 is out, and the license (http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.2/LICENSE)
> contains the
Matt Welsh wrote:
>
> JDK 1.2 is out, and the license (http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.2/LICENSE)
> contains the following language:
>
> > You may not publish or provide the results of any benchmark or comparison
> > tests run on Software to any third party without the prior written consent
>
I'm pleased that this has happened. Good luck to the porting team.
Please forgive me if this next question violates the "don't be a stick in
the mud" and "don't look a gift horse in the mouth" axioms, but, are there
any plans to port the Java 3D API to Linux? Thanks.
-Andy
> -Original M
--
| From: hswong / mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To: A.KLOS / mime, , , A.KLOS
| Cc: drobnic.pavlo / mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED];
| java-linux / mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: JDK 1.2 Support for CORBA
| Date: Thursday, October 01, 1998 9:50AM
|
| > I needed CO
> I needed CORBA support for Linux as well. At time I was not aware of
> any free Java ORB availbale so I did the following... I unzipped
> classes.zip from JDK1.2beta3
> for win32 and picked out the stuff related to CORBA (something like
> org.omg.corba.*)
> and re-zipped it as OMGCORBA.zip).
On Thu, 01 Oct 1998 00:57:23 +0200, Flag wrote:
>Maybe a stupid question,
>
>Is there the jdk 1.2 for Linux?!?!?!?
Not a stupid question - but one that we can only say that the source
code licenses are not available from Sun until the product ships. We
have, thus, not even seen the JDK 1.2 sour
Flag wrote:
> Is there the jdk 1.2 for Linux?!?!?!?
>
> Thanks
There is some information in the FAQ at -
http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/docs/faq/FAQ-java-linux.html
2.7 When is the JDK 1.2 Going to be Released for Linux?
According to Steve Byrne on Monday, May 26th 1998:
JavaSoft
--
| From: drobnic.pavlo / mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To: hswong / mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED]; java-linux /
| mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: JDK 1.2 Support for CORBA
| Date: Monday, September 28, 1998 12:28PM
|
| > I'm looking for JDK1.2 for Linux as I ne
> I'm looking for JDK1.2 for Linux as I need CORBA support. I was
> wondering what the timeline is for the release and whether I can help
> with the porting. Thanks
Probably you don't need JDK1.2 for playing with CORBA.
There are few CORBA2 compatible ORBs writen completely in java who
> Hoong-Shen Wong writes:
> Hi, I'm looking for JDK1.2 for Linux as I need CORBA support. I was
> wondering what the timeline is for the release and whether I can
> help with the porting. Thanks
Non-commercial licensees have no access to the 1.2 sources yet,
so there is *no* timeline for a l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Do you have any plans about porting JDK 1.2 to Linux (i386)? Or are you
> waiting for the final version? A preliminar work on the beta releases
> would be fine, I think - then when the final version is out, OUR final
> version won't delay a lot.
Firstly I am not JDK so
there will be ports, if there will be src. i guess its up to sun/javasoft to
say yay/nay.
gat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> will there be a jdk1.2 port in the near future (even for the betas)? I'd
> like to use collections and I'm not willing to switch to NT :-(
>
> cheers,
>
> Gabor
>
> --
Hello Gabor,
Look at JGL pure Java container library
(http://www.objectspace.com/jgl/) from Object Space. It is absolutely
free, is given in source code and much more powerful that 1.2.
collection stuff. I have read that Sun licenseed their library for 1.2.
but apparently they reduced it if used
On Mon, 25 May 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> will there be a jdk1.2 port in the near future (even for the betas)? I'd
> like to use collections and I'm not willing to switch to NT :-(
It is possible to use 1.2 collections with the jdk 1.1. If you go to
http://java.sun.com, go into the InfoBus
87 matches
Mail list logo
