Re: Java app

2005-01-11 Thread Rikard Froberg
Marek Pawinski wrote: Hi I am trying to install a app which uses java during the installation process. I get this error : ./setup.bin "Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/zerog/lax/LAX" Java looks for the com.zerog.lax.LAX class, so it must be within reach for the runt

RE: Java app and Native Processes on Linux

2000-03-20 Thread Lee_Xing
Hi:   I'm trying to use two java threads t1 and t2, and each one uses exec() to start the same C native application.  It seems JVM (BlackDown 1.1.8 v1) never switches from t1 to t2.  The output looks like:   In thread t1: i = 0 In thread t1: i = 1 In thread t1: i = 2   ...   I put s

Re: Java App placement in Gnome

2000-01-31 Thread Riyad Kalla
use a "JWindow" instead of a "JFrame" to get a frame that has NO decorations on it from the Window manager... people use them and "Window" clases a lot to do splash screens. -Riyad On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Peter Tillemans wrote: > > Robert Passaro wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > I'm using RedHat 6.0

Re: Java App placement in Gnome

2000-01-31 Thread Peter Tillemans
Robert Passaro wrote: Hello. I'm using RedHat 6.0 and IBM's jdk1.1.8 (1) Can someone tell me the linux command line to give a java app keyboard focus, without having to give its window a mouseclick? (I want to create an app that does not use a pointer of any kind) (2) Can someone tell me how I ca

Re: Java App placement in Gnome

2000-01-27 Thread peter johnson
ALT-TAB will switch between windows on fvwm and fvwm-95, maybe with other window managers also. Window.toFront() will move a window to the foreground and get the focus; Component.requestFocus() should make a component active, although I've found this doesn't work sometimes, particularly if the co

Re: Java app server on linux ?

1999-05-24 Thread Marcel Ruff
> Yes, to DB2 from EJB. DB2 runs beautifully on Linux. I am running the beta > version but it is still great. Give it plenty of memory though. > But we will soon try out Oracle 8. We are fairly confident as Oracle's JDBC > type 4 driver is very good. I have used it elsewhere. Hopefully should not

RE: Java app server on linux ?

1999-05-23 Thread Aravind Selvaraje
My case RedHat 6.0 JDK 1.1.7 v2 BEA WebLogic 4.02 Also, using Apache and Jserv. Works great. > -Original Message- > From: Nitin Borwankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, 23 May 1999 12:30 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Java app server on linux ? > > > > Is anyone usin

Re: Java app server on linux ?

1999-05-23 Thread Steve Nguyen
Try w3c JIGSAW Web/Java Application Server; 100% Java HTTP and Servlet Runner. It runs on my Linux & NT Server both fine It's quite cool but still slow and a bit buggy Steve -Original Message- From: Nitin Borwankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sunda

Re: Java app server on linux ?

1999-05-23 Thread alx
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think Java Webserver is an all java web server. On Sat, 22 May 1999, Nitin Borwankar wrote: > > Is anyone using (development or production) > a Java application server such as BEA Weblogic or even > an all Java HTTP server such as Javasoft's Java Web

Re: Java app server on linux ?

1999-05-23 Thread Nitin Borwankar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think Java Webserver is an > all java web server. ACtually the Java WebServer is 100% Java. the SSL libraries are C and currently are only available on NT and Solaris. But you can run the server on Linux without using SS

Re: Java app server on linux ?

1999-05-23 Thread Nitin Borwankar
Aravind Selvaraje wrote: > > My case > > RedHat 6.0 > JDK 1.1.7 v2 > BEA WebLogic 4.02 > > Also, using Apache and Jserv. Do you connect to any of the big name databases over JDBC ? ( Oracle, Sybase, DB2 ... ) Nitin. > > Works great. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Nitin Borwan

Re: Java app server on linux ?

1999-05-23 Thread Aravind Selvaraje
Yes, to DB2 from EJB. DB2 runs beautifully on Linux. I am running the beta version but it is still great. Give it plenty of memory though. But we will soon try out Oracle 8. We are fairly confident as Oracle's JDBC type 4 driver is very good. I have used it elsewhere. Hopefully should not have t

Re: Java app server on linux ?

1999-05-23 Thread Gregory Steuck
The only plausible reason I can think of is performance. Anybody measured encryption speed when using RSA's libs? Nitin Borwankar writes: > ACtually the Java WebServer is 100% Java. > the SSL libraries are C and currently are only available on NT and > Solaris. > But you can run the server o

Re: Java app without X installed

1998-10-08 Thread Karl Asha
All the changes you have discussed have been made to the site and to the ftp site. The only change that remains to be made is to add the same link to the FAQ. That'll be something SteveW needs to do as soon as he gets a chance. Thanks for the helpful comments. Cheers, Karl Dan Kegel writes:

Re: Java app without X installed

1998-10-08 Thread Dan Kegel
Steve Byrne wrote: > > Dan Kegel writes: > > > Look again in README.linux. > > > > The doc could be made a little more accessible. Did you know there's > > no link to README.linux on http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux.html ? > > It ought to be right there next to the FAQ. > > It should al

Re: Java app without X installed

1998-10-08 Thread Steve Byrne
Dan Kegel writes: > Steve Byrne wrote: > > John Summerfield writes: > > > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the > > > Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about. > > I guess README.linux *could* be named more obviously :-

Re: Java app without X installed

1998-10-08 Thread Steve Byrne
Robert Ritchy writes: > Listen - as yet another newbie - don't screw things up for me. This list > has been EXTREMELY helpful to me and my work. The promptness and quality of > reponse from this list is unmatched. These "gurus" have taken a lot time to > give us a quality product and suppor

RE: Java app without X installed

1998-10-07 Thread Pelayo
Salud y naturaleza: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pelayo-j.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] ftp://ftp.pelayo-j.com -Mensaje original- De: Wim Ceulemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fecha: martes 6 de octubre de 1998 19:15 Asu

Re: Java app without X installed

1998-10-07 Thread John Summerfield
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote: > > > John Summerfield writes: > > > On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the > > > > > > Well I for

Re: Java app without X installed

1998-10-07 Thread John Summerfield
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote: > John Summerfield writes: > > On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote: > > > > > > > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the > > > > Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about. > >

RE: Java app without X installed

1998-10-07 Thread Java News Collector
At 01:14 PM 10/7/98 -0400, you wrote: >Let me just put in my two cents as another newbie. It's a pain in the >a** to have to RTFM all the time. Has anyone counted up all the >thousands of pages of documents there are out there? Speaking as >someone who has been R'ing TFM instead of asking, I ha

Re: Java app without X installed

1998-10-07 Thread Robert Ritchy
If you would take the time to observe this list for a while then you would realize that just about every question is answered almost immediately. I know I asked a lot of redundant and simple questions and always got an answer. Please, wait for more than one email as your reference before attacki

RE: Java app without X installed

1998-10-07 Thread Kanoza_D
5 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Java app without X installed > > John Summerfield writes: > > On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote: > > > > > > > > Aw, come on, man!

Re: Java app without X installed

1998-10-07 Thread 1a8
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote: > John Summerfield writes: > > On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote: > > > > > > > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the > > > > Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about. > >

RE: Java app without X installed

1998-10-07 Thread Kanoza_D
o the group, and only one of them is laziness. > -Original Message- > From: Robert Ritchy [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 1998 1:31 PM > To: Kanoza_D > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

Re: Java app without X installed

1998-10-07 Thread 1a8
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Robert Ritchy wrote: > Listen - as yet another newbie - don't screw things up for me. This list > has been EXTREMELY helpful to me and my work. The promptness and quality of > reponse from this list is unmatched. These "gurus" have taken a lot time to > give us a quality

Re: Java app without X installed

1998-10-07 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Kevin" == Kevin Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kevin> With that kind of attitude...heck...you could work for Kevin> Microsoft. Back off! Without his work you'd be using Microsoft! -- Stephen --- Perl is really designed more for the guys that will hack Perl at least 20 minut

Re: Java app without X installed

1998-10-07 Thread Robert Ritchy
;m hoping someone out there will be a little > understanding and give me a helping hand. I'm not asking you to come to > my house and do it for me, after all. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steve Byrne [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, October

Re: Java app without X installed

1998-10-07 Thread Kevin Johnson
With that kind of attitude...heck...you could work for Microsoft. > > Exercise patience and courtesy in your replies. You too were a beginner > > once. > > Yes. And I didn't ask for help before exhausting the other options, if I asked > for help at all. >

Re: Java app without X installed

1998-10-07 Thread Dan Kegel
Steve Byrne wrote: > John Summerfield writes: > > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the > > Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about. > I guess README.linux *could* be named more obviously :-) >... > > I can see no mention

Re: Java app without X installed

1998-10-07 Thread Steve Byrne
John Summerfield writes: > On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote: > > > > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the > > Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about. I guess README.linux *could* be named more obviously :-)

Re: Java app without X installed

1998-10-07 Thread Michael Sinz
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998 21:05:39 +0800 (WST), John Summerfield wrote: >On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote: > >> >> Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the > >Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about. >I've just installed the jre o

Re: Java app without X installed

1998-10-07 Thread John Summerfield
On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote: > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about. I've just installed the jre on a system without X. To make the jre even run I found it necessary to in