At 22:09 9/18/99 -0400, Michael Emmel wrote:
>Also it produces the slowest bytecode on the planet. Great for development.
[it == jikes] just because the bytecode is simple doesn't always mean it's
bad/slow... I'm starting to see JITTERs good enough to turn straight forward
bytecode such as that p
som ranting near the end but do not compile shipping code with jikes.
Also do not make IBM slow jikes down for shipping code : )
Michael Sinz wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 00:03:18 +0200, Ian Corner wrote:
>
> >You mentioned in a previous email the ibmjdk, is that Jikes? If not what is
> >Jik
Ian Corner wrote:
>
> You mentioned in a previous email the ibmjdk, is that Jikes? If not what is
> Jikes as I thought that was the IBM JVM. Do you happen to know what Java
> version Jikes is comparable to?
Jikes is the name of two separate IBM projects: a compiler (a very
active project) and a
At 00:03 10/19/99 +0200, Ian Corner wrote:
>You mentioned in a previous email the ibmjdk, is that Jikes? If not what is
nope
>Jikes as I thought that was the IBM JVM. Do you happen to know what Java
Jikes is a Java compiler, that is it takes in source code in the Java
Language and emits Bytecod
>
> You mentioned in a previous email the ibmjdk, is that Jikes? If not what is
> Jikes as I thought that was the IBM JVM. Do you happen to know what Java
> version Jikes is comparable to?
>
No, IBM's JVM is IBM's port of Sun's JVM. It's a JVM.
jikes is a java source to java bytecode compiler
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 00:03:18 +0200, Ian Corner wrote:
>You mentioned in a previous email the ibmjdk, is that Jikes? If not what is
>Jikes as I thought that was the IBM JVM. Do you happen to know what Java
>version Jikes is comparable to?
Jikes is the IBM Research Java Compiler. It is *very* fas
