Re: Status of 1.2 in this article

1999-03-02 Thread Nathan Meyers
David Harvill wrote: > The article is about the Blackdown project, not a different one. Yes it was, and it made a strong statement about availability without bothering to check a reliable source. Sort of puts all of those Clinton impeachment news stories into perspective, doesn't it :-)? Nathan

Re: Status of 1.2 in this article

1999-03-02 Thread David Harvill
The article is about the Blackdown project, not a different one. -dave On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Christopher Rowan wrote: > I saw a similar article somewhere else that got on my nerves. > > Don't let 'em steal your thunder! > > Steve Byrne wrote: > > > > Tom McMichael writes: > > > http://abcnews

Re: Status of 1.2 in this article

1999-03-02 Thread Uncle George
i Guess ur soul is ok Christopher Rowan wrote: > I saw a similar article somewhere else that got on my nerves. > > Don't let 'em steal your thunder! > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscrib

Re: Status of 1.2 in this article

1999-03-02 Thread Christopher Rowan
I saw a similar article somewhere else that got on my nerves. Don't let 'em steal your thunder! Steve Byrne wrote: > > Tom McMichael writes: > > http://abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/CNET/cnet_javalinux990301.html > > > > According to this article sun says that the 1.2 linux port will be done

Status of 1.2 in this article

1999-03-01 Thread Steve Byrne
Tom McMichael writes: > http://abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/CNET/cnet_javalinux990301.html > > According to this article sun says that the 1.2 linux port will be done > in > one to two weeks. Now isn't that interesting. And here I thought it was *I* who decided when we were ready. Hmm.

Status of 1.2 in this article

1999-03-01 Thread Tom McMichael
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/CNET/cnet_javalinux990301.html According to this article sun says that the 1.2 linux port will be done in one to two weeks. Tom McMichael [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL