hrm... that is very annoying... thanks.
--jason
On 15-Jan-99 Chris Abbey wrote:
> DOH! The signature was supposed to be:
> static void classFinalize() throws Throwable
> the one I gave was (obviously) instance finalization... see JLS §12.7.
>
> But it's a academic now, Javasoft has removed it f
DOH! The signature was supposed to be:
static void classFinalize() throws Throwable
the one I gave was (obviously) instance finalization... see JLS §12.7.
But it's a academic now, Javasoft has removed it from the JLS -- see
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/class-finalization-rationale.html
for
a static finalize method causes the compiler (jikes in this case) to return:
93. public static void finalize ()
<->
*** Error: The static method "void finalize();" cannot hide the instance method
--jason
On 14-Jan-99 Chris Abbey wrote:
>>Is there
>Is there any way to detect when a class is going to be unloaded from the
vm
>sort of the opposite of static { ... }?
>
>--jason
In theory or in practice?
In theory the JLS says so, put a static method finalize() in the class
(sorry, don't remember the protection, maybe public??) and the VM
Is there any way to detect when a class is going to be unloaded from the vm
sort of the opposite of static { ... }?
--jason
At 12:32 PM 1/7/99 +0100, Chr. Clemens Lahme wrote:
>when I added a System.exit( 0 ) call to main, jre does work for me.
Oi. I got the same results. So now there is DIFFERENT behaviour on between
the java and jre runners . . . just peachy. I'm going to have a look into
that might be a bug to
John,
At this point I'd say they've got a bug in the version you have installed
on possum, "Linux_JDK_1.1.7_v1a_green_threads", but not on the one on emu,
"stevemw:08/29/98-05:16". I hate to add a variable at this point... but
what about native threaded?? -=Chris
At 07:04 AM 1/8/99 +0800, John S
ne 9 to this:
System.out.print("\nfinalize\n");
as I got some output (on emu) and "finalize" was separated from its
followong newline.
Since it works on emu running with java_g, I'm not posting its trace.
> John's understanding of finalizer and runFinalizersOn
As someone else mentioned the test code did work for me with jdk1.1.7 v1a
with java, but not with jre.
Just wanted to add, that,
when I added a System.exit( 0 ) call to main, jre does work for me.
Bye,
Clemes
Changed test example:
public class F
{
protected void finalize() throws T
John (& all),
Sorry I didn't jump into this thread earlier, but the s:n on this list
has pushed it down my reading priority list ... way down.
John's understanding of finalizer and runFinalizersOnExit as I've
understood him to state it in this thread matches my
the
> objects that must be finalized: in the constructor, add the new object
> to a Vector; when you're done with one run the finalizer yourself.
I CAN call the finalizer() mtself. However, I'm trying to write a class
that will clean itself up without the programmer having to remem
daniel dulitz wrote:
> If (as someone else indicated) Sun's JVM uses a conservative garbage
> collector, then even though one may force garbage collection, there's
> no way to force the garbage collector to recognize that a particular
> object is in fact garbage.
Sun's JVM, at least JDK 1.0.X an
ld be very difficult (or
impossible) to achieve with a conservative garbage collector.
There is a workaround, if you don't need to garbage collect the
objects that must be finalized: in the constructor, add the new object
to a Vector; when you're done with one run the finalizer yo
On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, Catalin CLIMOV wrote:
> Very strange.
> I tried to run your code and it worked fine with java (it displayed 'finelize'),
> but it didn't work with jre (it finished without displaying anything).
> I use the same jdk on Linux 5.1, kernel 2.0.34.
I thought this was it as I use j
On Jan 5, 1:30pm, Eduard Boukhman wrote:
> Subject: Re: finalizer()
> On Jan 5, 1:22pm, Catalin CLIMOV wrote:
> > Subject: Re: finalizer()
> > Very strange.
> > I tried to run your code and it worked fine with java (it displayed
> 'finelize'),
> &g
On Jan 5, 1:22pm, Catalin CLIMOV wrote:
> Subject: Re: finalizer()
> Very strange.
> I tried to run your code and it worked fine with java (it displayed
'finelize'),
> but it didn't work with jre (it finished without displaying anything).
> I use the same j
Very strange.
I tried to run your code and it worked fine with java (it displayed 'finelize'),
but it didn't work with jre (it finished without displaying anything).
I use the same jdk on Linux 5.1, kernel 2.0.34.
Catalin CLIMOV.
John Summerfield wrote:
> I have this code:
> public class F
>
I have this code:
public class F
{
protected void finalize() throws Throwable
{
System.out.println("finalize");
super.finalize();
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws Throwable
{
F f = new F();
Sy
18 matches
Mail list logo
