Re: glibc2/jdk1.1.5v7

1998-05-13 Thread Sorin Lingureanu
Now the rpm for glibc/jdk1.1.5.v7 is available at: ftp://ftp.redhat.com/contrib/hurricane/i386/jdk-1.1.5-7.i386.rpm On Tue, 12 May 1998, Robert Lynch wrote: > Andy Stubbs wrote: > > > > OK... obviously I've not got them working together, so before I launch > > into full diagnostics: I notice

Re: glibc2/jdk1.1.5v7

1998-05-12 Thread Andy Stubbs
On Tue, 12 May 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Just in case anyone hasn't said it yet, add my name to the list of > the eternally grateful for the glibc jdk, Chris,Steve, Karl et al. > I don't normally post "me too"s, but this is gonna be the exception to the rule. Me Too. I've final

Re: glibc2/jdk1.1.5v7

1998-05-12 Thread joe
On Tue, 12 May 1998, Christopher Seawood wrote: [ [Actually, the glibc 2.0.7-7 of which I speak is an official update for RH [5.0. It can be found in [ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/redhat-5.0/updates/i386/ . Until RH gets [ContribNet (http://developer.redhat.com/contribnet/) setup anything in

Re: glibc2/jdk1.1.5v7

1998-05-12 Thread Travis Shirk
On Tue, 12 May 1998, Andy Stubbs wrote: > > OK... obviously I've not got them working together, so before I launch > into full diagnostics: I notice on the website that glibc-2.0.7-7 is the > redhat package recommended. Now, not being an rpm type, I only have 2.0.6 > (this is the latest one I ca

Re: glibc2/jdk1.1.5v7

1998-05-12 Thread Christopher Seawood
On Tue, 12 May 1998, Andy Stubbs wrote: > As it happens, it isn't actually there; it's in the updates directory for > RH 5.0. BUT... I can't work out why jdk1.1.5 is linked against a version > of glibc2 which doesn't appear to exist in anything other than .rpm format > and isn't even at the gnu f

Re: glibc2/jdk1.1.5v7

1998-05-12 Thread Andy Stubbs
On Tue, 12 May 1998, charles verge wrote: > I belive glibc2.0.7-7 is in the > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/contirb/hurricane/i386 > > I would check but I am useing MacOS (not mine) and it is so messed up > that I can no connect to some servers on the internet. As it happens, it isn't actually

Re: glibc2/jdk1.1.5v7

1998-05-12 Thread Christopher Seawood
On Tue, 12 May 1998, charles verge wrote: > I belive glibc2.0.7-7 is in the > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/contirb/hurricane/i386 > > I would check but I am useing MacOS (not mine) and it is so messed up > that I can no connect to some servers on the internet. Actually, the glibc 2.0.7-7 of which

Re: glibc2/jdk1.1.5v7

1998-05-12 Thread Cogmaster
PLEASE DELETE THE INCOGNITO.NET DOMAIN FROM THIS LIST.   PLEAE ADVISE HOW IT BECAME LISTED. -Original Message-From: charles verge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: 12 May, 1998 6:02 PMSubject: Re: glibc2/jdk1.1.5v7I belive

Re: glibc2/jdk1.1.5v7

1998-05-12 Thread charles verge
I belive glibc2.0.7-7 is in the ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/contirb/hurricane/i386 I would check but I am useing MacOS (not mine) and it is so messed up that I can no connect to some servers on the internet. > >OK... obviously I've not got them working together, so before I launch >into full dia

Re: glibc2/jdk1.1.5v7

1998-05-12 Thread Robert Lynch
Andy Stubbs wrote: > > OK... obviously I've not got them working together, so before I launch > into full diagnostics: I notice on the website that glibc-2.0.7-7 is the > redhat package recommended. Now, not being an rpm type, I only have 2.0.6 > (this is the latest one I can *find*) which I comp

glibc2/jdk1.1.5v7

1998-05-12 Thread Andy Stubbs
OK... obviously I've not got them working together, so before I launch into full diagnostics: I notice on the website that glibc-2.0.7-7 is the redhat package recommended. Now, not being an rpm type, I only have 2.0.6 (this is the latest one I can *find*) which I compiled myself... So my question