More on idlj

2000-06-11 Thread Brett W. McCoy
Now I feel rather foolish about my earlier question on idlj: the _Impl classes weren't generated because I didn't use the -fserver argument to the compiler. Doh! But all is well now... Brett W. McCoy

Re: idlj

2000-06-11 Thread Brett W. McCoy
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, Nelson Minar wrote: > >Anyway, the output of idlj doesn't quite grok with the CORBA tutorial > >(HelloWorld); namely, it doesn't generate a ImplBase abstract class > >but instead generates an Operations *interface*, which looks like it > >

Re: idlj

2000-06-11 Thread Nelson Minar
Slashdot picked up my note about JavaOne. >Anyway, the output of idlj doesn't quite grok with the CORBA tutorial >(HelloWorld); namely, it doesn't generate a ImplBase abstract class >but instead generates an Operations *interface*, which looks like it >must be implemented

idlj

2000-06-11 Thread Brett W. McCoy
After not touching Java for like a year or two, I've started a new job that is going to require some Java programming. So, I'm giving myself a refresher course in Java, using the 1.3 JDK beta. I notice it now includes idlj, which replaces the old idltojava compiler, for which, I th