Nathan Meyers wrote:
> The choice is to wait for a real release. The porting team has dealt
> with a lot of distractions just getting to this point and having reached
> it -- a beta release that works quite well -- is no small
> accomplishment. But it is a beta, whose purpose in life is to shake
Albert Y.C. Lai wrote:
>
> Nicholas Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Don't upgrade then, let someone else test the cutting edge stuff. The
> > point of linux is that you have choise.
>
> [...]
>
> Except that by now Java 2 is no longer supposed to be cutting edge
> stuff. Yet, if I get
On 24 Mar 1999, Albert Y.C. Lai wrote:
stuff. Yet, if I get it right, that the linux port requires such
beasts as libstdc++-libc6.0-1.so.2 means it is linked against cutting
Well, libstdc++-libc6.0-1.so.2 isn't a "real" library, I don't
believe. Simply symlinking libstdc++.so to the "beast
Nicholas Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Don't upgrade then, let someone else test the cutting edge stuff. The
> point of linux is that you have choise.
[...]
Except that by now Java 2 is no longer supposed to be cutting edge
stuff. Yet, if I get it right, that the linux port requires such
ederlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 1999 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: libstdc++-libc6.0-1.so.2... and the Linux mess (IMHO)
>
>
>Excuse the off topic post, but... ;)
>
>On Thu, 18 Mar 1999, Osvaldo Pinali Doederlein wrote:
>
>
>&
Excuse the off topic post, but... ;)
On Thu, 18 Mar 1999, Osvaldo Pinali Doederlein wrote:
> Now, maybe this is not the appropriate list for the question, but I can't
> get latest gnome working because of the infamous __register_frame_info crap,
> and moving to the glib 2.1 will cause other p
Create a symlink to your 2.8.0 lib, and should work...
Now, maybe this is not the appropriate list for the question, but I can't
get latest gnome working because of the infamous __register_frame_info crap,
and moving to the glib 2.1 will cause other problems. The status of system
libraris in Lin
