Which version of linux on which is JDK compiled?

What platform on which does binary distribution of JDK for linux compiled? Which version of linux kernel? As the linux patch to JDK shows us, linux JDK distinguishes whether the platform supports signal handler with three arguments or only one argument, with the macro SA_SIGINFO. The macro SA_SI

How come I get this error message?

Hi, How come I get these error messages when I run java ICQ and other java applications?: SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation stackbase=0xb270, stackpointer=0xb174 Full thread dump: "Finalizer thread" (TID:0x4064a208, sys_thread_t:0x4138ef04, state:R) prio=1 "A

Re: What happened to the Alpha port from Uncle George?

can anyone give him a hand with the port. H. Paul Haiduk wrote: > -- > Can you give me a URL for Uncle George or for > anyone else involved > in the Linux port to the Digital Alpha platform? > It seems that the > URL: http://www.voicenet.com/~gatgul/JDK/ is now > blocked from access. > > --

JIT Compiler?

Can anyone recommend a JIT to use in the following environment? Linux kernel version 2.0.27 Apache 1.3 JRun 2.1.3 JDK 1.1.6 (port by Blackdown) bc _ R O B E R T C U R T I S S Internet Programmer [EMAI

Getting applets to run on Netscape 4.06

I'm running Redhat 5.1, KDE 1.0 and Netscape 4.06 with JDK1.1.6v5. I get the following error when trying to access an applet: " Warning: JIT compiler "jit" not found. Will use interpreter. Could not get localized resources: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: native method java/util/ResourceBundle.g

Re: Which version of linux on which is JDK compiled?

On Sat, 31 Oct 1998 15:45:39 +0900, SHUDOH Kazuyuki wrote: >What platform on which does binary distribution of JDK >for linux compiled? Which version of linux kernel? Well, the 1.1.6 v5 and v5a builds for x86 systems were done on: for glibc - a RedHat 5.0 base system with curren

Re: JDK for 21064?

actually a 21164a ( the "a" really counts - who wuddya thunkit ) i'm gonny try to see if i can build for all processors with 117, and see if it all will fit under 10 meg. these processors are ( 21064, 21164, and 21164a ). at the moment i am having probs with finding a home. The folks at blackdown

Re: Alpha port?

what is habanero??? gat > But found some problems when trying to use habanero on top of it.

Re: JDK for 21064?

Quoting Uncle George ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > actually a 21164a ( the "a" really counts - who wuddya thunkit ) > i'm gonny try to see if i can build for all processors with 117, and see > if it all will fit under 10 meg. these processors are ( 21064, 21164, > and 21164a ). > If you build one that

Re: Alpha port?

> "Uncle" == Uncle George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Uncle> what is habanero??? gat >> But found some problems when trying to use habanero on top of >> it. Its a groupware application and environment for developing groupware in java. You can find it at. http://www.ncsa.uiuc

Re: JDK for 21064?

> "Uncle" == Uncle George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Uncle> actually a 21164a ( the "a" really counts - who wuddya Uncle> thunkit ) i'm gonny try to see if i can build for all Uncle> processors with 117, and see if it all will fit under 10 Uncle> meg. these processors are ( 2

Re: JDK for 21064?

On Sat, Oct 31, 1998 at 12:01:52PM -0500, Eric Bohm wrote: > > "Uncle" == Uncle George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Uncle> actually a 21164a ( the "a" really counts - who wuddya [Snip] > Uncle> :-( . My 250 meg web xfer/month appears to be exhausted. > Uncle> oh, well. > > I

Re: JDK for 21064?

On Sat, 31 Oct 1998 11:05:03 -0500, Uncle George [fwd by sbb] wrote: >[sbb: Here's what Uncle George wrote:] > >actually a 21164a ( the "a" really counts - who wuddya thunkit ) >i'm gonny try to see if i can build for all processors with 117, and see >if it all will fit under 10 meg. these proces